Ejarra wrote:
Ah, the two DD theory. I've been in the camp that there was and is two DDs. In fact, I think I was one of the first to start talking about is a long time ago. I believe it was last spring or early summer. I just don't believe they way they say the same words come out the same. The timing, phrasing, accents placed on certain syllables are different, the way I hear them. And way back when, they had two very different illnesses, even though the interviews were only a couple of weeks apart, she couldn't remember what made her sick? Or was it, she couldn't remember her line of what made DD1 sick.
Now for me recently, it was the 16 vs 18 (now 19) age screw up. I believe that there is a 2 to 3 year age difference between the two. DD1 really was 16 soon to be 17, the same age and grade as Trayvon. How are we supposed to believe that they went to Kindergarten together when there was at least a 2 year difference in age? Again, it's not believable.
I had said that this was a tail wagging the dog story where one starts with the ending and then try to have it build to the beginning to have it make sense. Supposedly she was an unknown girl until she was interviewed by BLDR. No one was to know her identity, so because if that anyone could have been interviewed by BLDR. The Martins knew her name, but they would never say who she was. The name of W8, the one that fit alphabetically between W7, Brandi Green and W9, Christina Johnson, now had a name; which could have easily been different that DD1's.
Now on to who holds the key to the mystery, it's Matt Guttman and ABC. In order to interview her, she HAD to SIGN a RELEASE. If she was a minor, then a parent or guardian signs it. They know who DD1 is and if she is DD2, but will they tell? I don't think they can, YET.
I disagree with the Theory of Dueling DD's, and have always considered it to be a "rabbit hole" that has distracted the discussion about Witness 8. I believe there is one, and only one DD, and that all sorts of "Red Herrings" have been tossed out to keep the media and public away from her, and away from the truth about how and when she first communicated with Tracy, Sybrina, and Ben Crump.
Was she at the wake or funeral? Who knows? I won't believe she was there (or NOT there) until I see PROOF of either alternative. A picture of her at the service, a signature on a registry, or solid documentation that she was NOT there because her whereabouts can be documented at a different location during the times of either the wake AND the funeral. Where does the controversy about her attendance spring from? It comes from the deceivers, Sybrina, Crump, and DD said she was NOT there, but a FAMILY member said she WAS there. BOTH are from the same source as far as I see, and it is a MANUFACTURED CONTROVERSY designed to distract and confuse!
The distraction is intended to draw attention away from something they fear WILL be discovered, which means it is something that CAN be discovered. Quite simply, somewhere along the line they made a MISTAKE that will allow someone to uncover the fact that DD was already in communication with the family PRIOR to 3/18. And I believe the answer lies in her PHONE RECORDS. And I am NOT talking about her CELL, I am talking about her HOME phone. I believe that either DD called Sybrina, Tracy, or Crump from her HOME phone, or one of them accidentally called HER at the home number by mistake, and they fear that her home phone records will reveal that call. This explains TWO things: Why Crump would NOT call her home number when he had audio problems on 3/19, and WHY they have resisted providing her address to the defense. Once that home phone number is revealed, the records will show that SOMEONE called that number, or was called FROM that number LONG BEFORE 3/18. Maybe even before 3/2. 
Login
FAQ
Do not go gentle into that good night.
