LOL! First, I thought that I was being original. Then, I thought that JQ used the same silly bird to connect the dots. Then, I thought you had saved it to your computer.

I can't decide to be embarrassed or not for being so technology deficient.

Proof it was George Zimmerman screaming

(Snipped for brevity)

CMSIQ says:
December 12, 2012 at 11:25 am

Over at TalkLeft, Jeralyn does a great job of deconstructing the state’s case against GZ. GZ’s defense is a textbook self defense case. There is simply no evidence that contradicts his self defense, and a significant amount that corroborates it.

What makes GZ’s position so strong, is that Jeralyn does not even look at character. Takes it completely off the table. From my mind, you cannot look at crime without looking at motive and character. And the The more you compare TM to GZ, the more obvious this case comes. Race has NOTHING to do with character,

Trayvon’s social networking posts are not the worst part of it by far. They don’t paint the picture of the greatest kid in the world, but also not the worst. The most negative posts are that Trademark was possibly a small time dealer (nobody should care he was a user), possibly punched a bus driver, and Treehouse’s brilliant discovery that he was a LEAN user.

Trayvon’s school records are much much more damaging to his character. His school records were purposely sealed by Scheme Team (for good reason), but the little bit we do know paints the picture of a very bad kid.
Suspended three times the last 7 months from school. Last suspension for 10 days.
Attendance record terrible at school. No extra curricular activities or sports.
InSession reports that there is past violence in his school records.
TM’s grades have never been reported, but considering the above, and that Team Skittles have not released them, they are most likely pretty bad.

Tracy Martin, unwillingly of course, has also not painted a rosy picture of his son.
Leaves his son unattended and unsupervised days/nights at a time. His Mom did this too.
Multiple facebook posts that his son was out of control, and that he didn’t have the time or energy to invest.
When he didn’t know where TM was, he thought his son would show up in the back of a police car.
First place they thought to call, was not the police,but the juvenile detention center?

If the unfortunate series of bad decisions and bad luck did not take place that night, Trayvon would have had his whole life to transform into a great person and positive member of society. I do not think for a second Trayvon did not have potential. But the simple fact of the matter is that at 17, he was out of control and simply a bad kid. Attacking GZ, because GZ eyeballed him was completely in character of TM.

on 13 December 2012.
We feel a responsibility to make a public, affirmative stance against any and all incidents of cyber attacks or “doxing” to anyone associated with this case, any one suspected as being associated with this case, or to anyone who contributes to the conversation about this case.

We have heard that some witnesses, or possible witnesses, and supporters on both sides of this case have been the victims of cyber attacks or doxing (the act of publishing personal documents about the individual on the Internet). With a case of such intense scrutiny, we are in uncharted waters regarding how the case is discussed publicly, and the online accessibility of individuals associated with the case. As the defense team, we have taken a well-documented proactive stance on how we manage our digital media presence. Our policy regarding digital media makes us particularly aware of the online conversation regarding our case, and we attempt to adjust our online presence as we see the need.

We first became aware of these concerns while we hosted the George Zimmerman Legal Case page on Facebook. Part of the reason we discontinued our presence on Facebook was because we were uncomfortable being in any way associated with people engaged in such practices and we refused to provide a platform where this practice could take place.

We understand that there may have been such actions directed at individuals who may be associated with Witness #8. In an October 19 hearing, the defense team requested a Subpoena Duces Tecum for the social media accounts of Witness #8; however, we intentionally did not disclose her name or any possible Twitter handle out of respect for her privacy. (We still have not been informed of her Twitter handles). If there is an individual who has been mistaken as Witness #8, and if this individual has been subjected to these practices, then we feel that those who knew Witness #8’s identity and therefore her Twitter handle, such as the State Attorneys Office or the handlers of the Martin family, have had many specific opportunities through social media or press conferences to publicly correct the misrepresentations and end the concerns -- an opportunity they have yet to take. We implore them to do so now, to minimize any further damage. If they know the Twitter handles are of a person unrelated to the case, why has this not been publicized?

We are taking this opportunity to say that we do not condone or encourage such practices; and anyone who wishes to make a beneficial contribution to this case must know that they do a considerable disservice if they engage in such practices, and we unequivocally condemn the practices mentioned above.