It has been claimed that this Senate repeal vote (as proposed by McConnell) requires 60 votes... WRONG

Even though REPEAL OBAMACARE 2015 was vetoed by Obama ultimately, it did pass the Senate by a narrow, party-line margin of 52-47
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... re/418644/ I guess some people are "confused" because the original 2009 "Obamacare" legislation was passed (along party lines) 60 to 39

However, although it is TRUE that the 2015 Bill was NOT strictly a "full repeal of Obamacare"... it looks "close enough" to me (a defunding Bill).. and McConnell is talking about the vote now being on a Bill along the same lines as 2015, and that requires 51 votes only.
Quote:
The measure passed by the Senate on Thursday doesn't actually repeal Obamacare in its entirety. To be able to pass a bill with a simple majority of 51 votes, rather than the filibuster-proof threshold of 60, Republicans needed to use a process known as budget reconciliation, which requires that provisions directly affect the budget. (Democrats used this same process to pass part of the original law in 2010 after Scott Brown’s victory in the Massachusetts Senate race deprived them of their 60th vote.) As such, the bill does not scrap the health law’s provisions allowing parents to keep their children covered under their insurance plans through age 26, or the prohibition on insurers discriminating against people with preexisting conditions, among others. But it does gut the law by eliminating the insurance exchanges and subsidies, and by repealing the Medicaid expansion accepted by 30 states.
ETAI see SHEP SMITH is stressing the same point..... that this is "defunding" and not a "full repeal" of Obamacare.
If Shep Smith is making same point... it's confirmed as CRAP!