murderbythebook wrote:
From working in Florida, I know if there was any contact such as punching the father in law in the nose, the police are bound by law to arrest. If there was any gun pointing and threats, the police are bound to arrest and confiscate the weapon.
If anything happens after this, and no arrest was made, the police become liable. I believe nothing happened except verbally and if the computer was damaged, that is his property too and he can destroy his own property.
I wonder why the media hasn't picked up on him now seeing the woman who had tried to have him arrested before. They are reporting a domestic dispute in his past, but if that is the same woman, that sure cancels that out.
I believe this was all a verbal dispute.
I'm in FL too and I know that if no one admits to "touching" then no one can be arrested because there is no evidence. I also know that destroying the ipad can be viewed as destroying his own property, but that it can also be viewed as violence if it's taken from one's spouse, or done as a threat. I could go on, but my point is that there's the law, which in essence requires that on
any dv call
someone must go to jail, but that's not always the same as what happens in practice. If it was, one of them would have went to jail yesterday.
As far as I know, SZ at no time alleged GZ brandished any weapon. She said she felt threatened by him, and by him having his hand on it. MOM said GZ had his hand on his weapon.
It clearly was not all a verbal dispute. The ipad was not verbally destroyed. SZ's father's nose has a mark on it. MOM said there was some shoving or pushing.
I am truly not comfortable pointing out ways that GZ bears some responsibility here. But I am also not comfortable in putting it all on SZ. They've both done some very hurtful things to each other.
_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.
