kbp wrote:
'Rachel admits Trayvon was aggressor, only inflicting "whoop azz." ...[not] out to "just bash or ...kill"'
liesel wrote:
Yes, that's a good one too, kbp. But really, what part of #8's various performances wasn't daft?

The point I meant to convey also covers a huge part of Bernie's strategy used in the trial. We know there were 3 reasons of defense open for justification of homicide:
1) Fear for loss of life;
2) Fear for great bodily harm; and
3) Forcible felony.
Bernie addressed #2 when he tried to convince the jurors the injuries were not that bad, as he also twisted #1 in his effort to provide Trayvon that fear, generally ignoring #3 as if it was excused by his efforts on the other two.
Rachel told us the jury misunderstood that Trayvon would not do #1, it was just "whoop azz" #2, an act also covered by #3. She provides justfication for homicide under #2 and/or #3, as she explains the jury misunderstood #1 was never a concern ...knowledge only jurors from her 'hood could have been aware of.
So Rachel convicted Trayvon.