It is currently Sun May 18, 2025 7:38 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1020 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
In case you missed it:

GatewayPundit wrote:
TRAYVON ‘PROTESTERS’ SMACK Houston Grandmother – Won’t Let Family Take Child to Hospital (Video)

Trayvon protesters beat on cars during a rally in Houston this week.
The ‘protesters’ beat on a car, beat a grandmother and wouldn’t let a local family take their child to a hospital.

The protesters smacked the grandmother in the car as she was trying to get to the hospital.
Image

“It wasn’t peaceful. It was terrifying.”


...

Read more at the Gateway Pundit, linked above.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:02 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Lets not get too carried away with the "poor Rachel, never learned cursive".

... maybe she can, maybe she can not... but WHY at her age???

I would bet that the Prosecution MADE THAT STORY UP.

It is part of the FALSE NARRATIVE about who and what Rachel is... part of the Scheme.. now embelished by the media... (dopes like Piers Morgan)

WHY did she not then PRINT such a short little crappy note? And do it herself?

It looked to me that she could not READ at all.... handed documents during her testimony.. some of that was typed.

IMO she can neither read nor write.

She is clearly NOT a "smart cookie" she has a LOW IQ... I would say has some sort of "learning problem"

In the REAL sense of the word... she is retarded... that is clear to anybody who is not a libtard with their head up their arse. (eg Piers Morgan)

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
LondoJowo wrote:
I don't foresee the Feds pursuing a case against GZ. When you have people like Bill Cosby speaking out and saying GZ was not racially motivated it doesn't bode well for any civil rights violations being proven.

http://newsone.com/2635895/bill-cosby-george-zimmerman/
...

That is just great! Thanks for posting, Londo. Did you see O'Reilly predicting/observing a "verdict reaction shift"?

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Florida
Rumpole wrote:
Why did she not then PRINT such a short little crappy note? And do it herself?IMO she can neither read nor write.


That is what I have wondered all along. Although, it seems that she can read texts, or maybe not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:21 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Can SHE read texts? There is still uncertainty about which DD did what.

Maybe she can read short texts? But still not read a simple paragraph.

I do think it would be very revealing to give her some very simple psych tests... basic IQ and reading/writing/comprehension are easily checked.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Rumpole wrote:
Lets not get too carried away with the "poor Rachel, never learned cursive".

... maybe she can, maybe she can not... but WHY at her age???

I would bet that the Prosecution MADE THAT STORY UP.

It is part of the FALSE NARRATIVE about who and what Rachel is... part of the Scheme.. now embelished by the media... (dopes like Piers Morgan)

WHY did she not then PRINT such a short little crappy note? And do it herself?

It looked to me that she could not READ at all.... handed documents during her testimony.. some of that was typed.

IMO she can neither read nor write.

She is clearly NOT a "smart cookie" she has a LOW IQ... I would say has some sort of "learning problem"

In the REAL sense of the word... she is retarded... that is clear to anybody who is not a libtard with their head up their arse. (eg Piers Morgan)

I don't think anyone here is feeling sorry for RJ. To the contrary, it seems the consensus here is that she's a dope. ;) (Unless I missed a post?)

Since she's such a brazen liar it would be nothing to her to actually read her words in a transcript then deny saying them and claim the court reporter made an error. So, that's not exactly proof of her inability to read. Not saying it would surprise me, though.

I have spent a lot of time with ESE (Exceptional Student Education) and worked with children with a wide variety of challenges, even blindness. Developmentally Delayed students (formerly known as "retarded"), at least the ones I've worked with, have all been able to learn sight words and eventually read at < 1 reading level all the way up to 4.something reading level, depending on their individual abilities and length of time/amount of time they're in class. (Some students are so ill they may miss months of school, or frequently miss days due to their illness/challenge, or have regular therapy days that conflict with school hours.)

There are some things in RJ's demeanor and apparent abilities that would cause me to suspect she's an ESE student. OTOH, all of the challenged students I have known, without exception, are just the sweetest, kindest, most good hearted little people you could ever hope to be around. Of course, I work with kids in elementary school, and with severely challenged students, so she could still be an ESE student that is receiving services more due to socialization/home life, than developmental delay, cerebral palsy, downs syndrome, or the myriad other conditions with which I'm more familiar.

RJ's manipulative, lying, just plain rotten, nature, imo, doesn't fit in with the kids I've known.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
I should add - the socialization/home life kids usually don't stay very long in ESE. They're brought up to speed and then mainstreamed.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
auscitizenmom wrote:

That is what I have wondered all along. Although, it seems that she can read texts, or maybe not.

Good point - I'd guess she'd be pretty motivated to read/write texts and she has a twitter account. She may have someone else posting tweets, reading/writing texts for her, but it seems a lot of trouble.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
None of which, of course, explains "the letter" satisfactorily. It may be as has been previously suggested, the letter was written in hopes RJ's lying services would no longer be required. Or, the letter could have been as manufactured as everything else about her "memories".

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:31 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I used the word "retarded" on purpose. ( It is after all a Rachel quoted word) :)

I have come across "slow learners" who I would not condemn usually.

I think Rachel is "intellectually challenged" but with the addition of rorting the system, before and after this event.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Florida
Rumpole wrote:
There is still uncertainty about which DD did what.
Maybe she can read short texts? But still not read a simple paragraph.


Several good points :roll .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Florida
Rumpole wrote:
rorting??


Misspelling or New Zealander word? :37
Or do I need to check my English dictionary?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:44 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I dont think ANY of the DeeDee's have a hope in hell of actually remembering the detail of what they heard on the phone with TM on 26th Feb 2012.
Even less chance of remembering than Shipping Bao has. He at least has "notes" :slap

The original DD might have remembered a bit (not all) and could have been carefully interviewed to retrieve some memory... but a LOT of time has passed AND she (they) have had any memories contaminated by being fed false leading suggestions, and by blatant coaching. This DD is "remembering" what she has been told and what she remembers she said herself (true or not)... at the time she was probably in CYA mode.. trying to spin a story that at least left her out of any blame (eg if she told TM to not be a pussy mamma's boy, and go put the bangas on the creepy ass cracka)
Shipping Bao was actually trying to make some valid points... human memory IS very fragile. Nobody can actually remember a phone conversation they had over a year ago.. certainly not DD who may well have had millions of similar phone conversations.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:48 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
auscitizenmom wrote:
Misspelling or New Zealander word? :37
Or do I need to check my English dictionary?


rort
To cheat, rip-off, beat, defraud, hack or scam something.


Used often when describing somebody taking advantage of Government schemes

"rorting the system" :)

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Florida
Rumpole wrote:
To cheat, rip-off, beat, defraud, hack or scam something.
Used often when describing somebody taking advantage of Government schemes
"rorting the system" :)


Ahhhh, a good word to use anytime we mention anyone in Wash., D.C., or anyone in Politics. Hmmm! :84


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Rumpole wrote:
Can SHE read texts? There is still uncertainty about which DD did what.

Maybe she can read short texts? But still not read a simple paragraph.

I do think it would be very revealing to give her some very simple psych tests... basic IQ and reading/writing/comprehension are easily checked.

RJ is so contrary and disinterested, she wouldn't likely be very cooperative.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Rumpole wrote:
I used the word "retarded" on purpose. ( It is after all a Rachel quoted word) :)

I have come across "slow learners" who I would not condemn usually.

I think Rachel is "intellectually challenged" but with the addition of rorting the system, before and after this event.


I know you know, but we don't all have your education and background. :) And, of course, you're much more qualified to make some deductions based on her behavior than most of the rest of us. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, more like adding some context?

Rumpole, man of many hats:

Image

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Rumpole wrote:
I dont think ANY of the DeeDee's have a hope in hell of actually remembering the detail of what they heard on the phone with TM on 26th Feb 2012.
Even less chance of remembering than Shipping Bao has. He at least has "notes" :slap

The original DD might have remembered a bit (not all) and could have been carefully interviewed to retrieve some memory... but a LOT of time has passed AND she (they) have had any memories contaminated by being fed false leading suggestions, and by blatant coaching. This DD is "remembering" what she has been told and what she remembers she said herself (true or not)... at the time she was probably in CYA mode.. trying to spin a story that at least left her out of any blame (eg if she told TM to not be a pussy mamma's boy, and go put the bangas on the creepy ass cracka)
Shipping Bao was actually trying to make some valid points... human memory IS very fragile. Nobody can actually remember a phone conversation they had over a year ago.. certainly not DD who may well have had millions of similar phone conversations.


BBM - Yes, good points all. And as I've incessantly posted, I believe that's why she used the words "mama's boy" in her interview, because whomever was on the phone with TM™ also used them.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:02 am
Posts: 313


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:02 am
Posts: 313
Diana Tennis is filing to run for Orlando Circuit judge tomorrow. SO tonight is the last night she can join Greta while she’s running


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1020 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group