The only hate and lies I've seen in this case has been from the prosecution.

Wasn't able to watch this morning. Could someone please give me an idea how O'Mara did and was there any suprises? I would appreciate any feedback.

And I find West very attractive in his intelligence and passion, even though I usually can't stand defense attorneys.

Plus I dig bald dudes. My husband is always mystified but it's because he's jealous.

I know there are plans to deploy LE in case of Not very Civil unrest (riots)....

But.... has anybody though to have armies of counsellors on hand to cope with splody head Traybots?

And I find West very attractive in his intelligence and passion, even though I usually can't stand defense attorneys.

Plus I dig bald dudes. My husband is always mystified but it's because he's jealous.

Seems logical, but the majority of criminal trials end in a guilty verdict, something like 95% or more in federal cases. That said, the longer the verdict takes, the more difficulty they are likely having with a guilty verdict ...good for the defense. But there are exceptions to every rule of thumb.

We now know, well, maybe, could be, perhaps, Trayvon didn't go home because he didn't want to bring the scary man home to his little 12 yr old whoever.

Darn, I'm now left with more questions. Didn't they have locks on the doors? What about phones? Didn't he know how to dial 911? And my big question, so where did he run? Was he running around in circles like a dog chasing his tail? Yes, Mr, Guy, common sense...

I love West too and find him attractive. He reminds me of James Carville and doing it Cajun style. I love him too. He is very smart and outspoken.

Chip!!! Chip!!! Did you just hear THAT!!??

I can't remember now... Did MOM mention TM™ didn't call 911? That's a great point and I hope he didn't overlook by working without his notes.

Zimmerman Defense Gives Evidence-Rich Closing, State Appeals to “Heart”

This morning saw the defense give its closing statement in Florida v. Zimmerman, the last opportunity for them to deliver their compelling narrative of innocence to the jury. And boy, did Mark O’Mara deliver. In a closing rich with evidence, facts, and the law, O’Mara focused the jury on their legal obligation to deliver a verdict consistent with the State’s burden to prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

O’Mara stepped them through every significant piece of evidence, and every single witness that had appeared in court. He reminded them of their duty to come to a verdict using only the evidence actually presented at trial, and that any “filling in the gaps” must be seen as contributing towards reasonable doubt, and therefore towards a not guilty verdict. He urged them to do the opposite of what the State had suggested in BDLR’s fact-free closing, when the State seemed to suggest that the jury not be overly concerned with the evidence but rather apply their “common sense.”

...

I don't think MoM mentioned the position of the gun and TM going after it either.