It is currently Sun May 18, 2025 7:30 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1015 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:38 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Thanks, Mimi

The Jury Instructions are posted:


Zimmerman Trial Information

http://www.flcourts18.org/page.php?136


State v. Zimmerman (2012-CF-001083-A)

It is the goal of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit to ensure that the media and public are accommodated to the best of the Court's abilities during special interest/high profile proceedings. Below you will find media advisories and public record documents pertaining to State v. Zimmerman (2012-CF-001083-A). Please continue to check this website for updates. Documents will be posted as they are made available for public distribution.

Final Jury Instructions
http://www.flcourts18.org/PDF/Press_Rel ... ctions.pdf

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Yes, kbp -- that is what has drawn me to this case, as you so powerfully stated/quoted:

"...Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me."

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Thanks, Rumpole. I'll wait for some kind poster to do the English to liesel translation. :)

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:46 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Thanks to new member Palm305 for a couple of links :give


Analysis: George Zimmerman Probably Won't Be Convicted of Murder or Manslaughter -- Here's Why
ANALYSIS by DAN ABRAMS
July 7, 2013

I drew a legal conclusion on "Good Morning America" Saturday that would have surprised the Dan Abrams who covered the George Zimmerman case leading up to, and shortly after, his arrest.

Now that the prosecution's case against Zimmerman is in, as a legal matter, I just don't see how a jury convicts him of second degree murder or even manslaughter in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.

So what happened? How can an armed man who shot and killed an unarmed teen after being told by the police that he didn't need to keep following him, likely be found not guilty of those crimes?

...more at link
http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerm ... d9swtigws9


Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:49 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Georgie - Zimfan

Sing along.................

:DN4 Georgie was protecting his own neighborhood
Neighborhood watch he did the best that he could

Trayvon was wondering around, acting just like he was stoned
Georgie tried to keep him in sight, until he got punched in the nose
Trayvon mounted Georgie and then, beat his head on the cement

Trayvon wasn't practicing no stand your ground
Classic self defense is what the jury found

Bashing the back of his head, and punching him right in the nose
He screamed for someone to come help , Johnny then called 911
When John left Georgie's heart it just sank, He could have used some purple drank

Georgie.... I wish you were a neighbor of mine.
Georgie.... I wish you were a neighbor of mine.
:DN4



_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Jeralyn wrote:
Zimmerman: Anticipating Mark O'Mara's Closing

Mark O'Mara will give his closing argument tomorrow morning, using a vivid computer animation showing step by step the defense theory of how the encounter occurred. There were hours of testimony about the accuracy of the animation, and the Judge ruled it would not come into evidence but O'Mara could use it as a demonstrative exhibit during his closing.

...


Read more at TalkLeft.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
AndrewBranca wrote:
State’s Closing Argument: Two Hours of Raising Doubt

NOTE: Streaming video of the entirety of the State’s closing argument is provided at the bottom of this post.

Today, the State presented their closing argument to the jury in the matter of Florida v. Zimmerman. After 14 months of investigation and discovery, weeks of pre-trial hearings, weeks more of trial testimony, and the expenditure of taxpayer money on the order of a million dollars, this was it–this is where the State would close the deal and deliver their compelling narrative of guilt to the jury.

What the jury got was not a compelling narrative of guilt, however, but a rambling monologue of isolated bits of circumstantial evidence, much of which was consistent with–and even supportive of–the defense’s “self-defense” theory of the case.

...


Read more at Legal Insurrection.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:58 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Thanks to Princss6 :86


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Hmmm... Jeralyn of TalkLeft is concerned that BDLR's bizarre and bad performance today may have been a feint... and that the state has more tricks they plan to play through Guy's final summation.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:12 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
liesel wrote:
Hmmm... Jeralyn of TalkLeft is concerned that BDLR's bizarre and bad performance today may have been a feint... and that the state has more tricks they plan to play through Guy's final summation.


Are there any limits to closing argument rebuttal scope?

i.e. is it like a re-direct, that is limited by the scope of cross-examination? Or does the State have free rein to say anything they want in rebuttal?

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
liesel wrote:
Hmmm... Jeralyn of TalkLeft is concerned that BDLR's bizarre and bad performance today may have been a feint... and that the state has more tricks they plan to play through Guy's final summation.

So they'll finally present evidence of a crime?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
chipbennett wrote:

Are there any limits to closing argument rebuttal scope?

i.e. is it like a re-direct, that is limited by the scope of cross-examination? Or does the State have free rein to say anything they want in rebuttal?

They'll have free rein, much more so than many other judges would allow, imo.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
kbp wrote:
So they'll finally present evidence of a crime?

:Gslap

We can always count on you for at least a giggle...

What they'll do is try to create the illusion that there was a crime, make emotional pleas for justice, and try to make the jurors feel responsible for making the "right" decision, imo.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Objections are kind of frowned on during opening and closing arguments. I doubt MOM has done that very many times during his entire career. Kind of like MOM said in 30 years of practice he had never filed a motion for discovery sanctions but filed six in this case.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Oh yeah, and that the jury are racists if they don't convict. Not directly stated, mind you, just implied. Like the MLK paraphrase about #8 today.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:29 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Is it Legal?


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
liesel, do your tools allow YOU to pull up posts by a specific user? Boards I've monitored always allowed it.



Edit Rumpole
EVERYONE can search (view) a user's posts.
Click on profile

If you have posting questions... see help threads
or PM me or Liesel or Maltese Mama


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Branca thoroughly deconstructed BDLR's close in his piece linked above. He's not worried about Guy. He thinks it will be a re-Root. ;) However, that may be a bit of overconfidence, imo. With Root, Guy was constrained to facts, truth, logical inferences. He won't be so constrained in his close.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
Rumpole wrote:
Is it Legal?

Evidence of his personal habits or desires?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1015 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group