The leatherheads actually think JN has bent over backwards for the defense.

I am STILL not clear what the State theory is?

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Option #5: Martin had three hands

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

It seems to be GZ started all this and is a liar so he is guilty.

That the jury should find GZ guilty. Oh, you want reasons and facts to back that up? So does the jury, I expect.

BDLR clearly used the break to look at Trayborg™ websites - using 10 hands, etc., leaving no Trayborg™ fantasy unfulfilled.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Entire closing is What Traybot's Believe 101.

I don't think they know either

I think Bernie's using the throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks method.

Bernie putting on an effective argument to disprove hatred, ill will, and spite by pointing out that Zimmerman fired one shot, then re-holstered his firearm.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

- didn't even steal skittles, legitimately bought them...

What??

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Well, Chip, no surprise because the state proved self defense with almost every witness they called.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

George reached for his ______________

Where did I read that Trayvon defended himself with the punch?

You'd think BDLR would have learned through his questioning of Mrs. Donnelly that the language isn't that big of a deal. And the more he uses it, the less shock value (as if it had any) remains.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Wet grass on his shoe could be from walking in wet grass or getting up from being on the ground in wet grass.

This is so ridiculous.

If this short amount of time of Mr. Zimmerman "following" would give someone a reason to attack, there would be a wide swath of assault victims across every neighborhood in America. As far as known evidence, there is nothing that justified Mr. Martin's blitz attack.

This is where I wish the real Trayvon had been allowed to be presented. It would have gone a long way

Bernie's argument: Zimmerman is guilty of murder because he didn't defend himself well enough.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

If the jacket would have been scraped up, would that reflect that it did not slide up an expose that gun Trayvon couldn't see?