Sybrina is going to be re-called at a later time

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.

Traymom™ seems to be trying to cry, imo. Could appear as trying not to.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Anger coming through loud and clear...refuses to answer with a direct respons.

Next up, the half brother.

_________________
Took my time machine into the shop for service and they said they'd get on it first thing last week.

Why would the prosecution put Jahavaris Fulton on the stand, when the defense will surely present evidence of him stating that he couldn't tell that the voice was Trayvon Martin's?

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

Kathi Belich, WFTV
The defense asked her if she hoped that her son did nothing that led to his own death. She did not answer 1/2 #Zimmermanon9

Kathi Belich, WFTV
And said she did not understand the question. 2/2 #Zimmermanon9

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.

"I heard him yell, BUT NOT LIKE THAT" (emphasis mine)

Wow...that was odd...internet not allowing me into RT and saying it's "not available" for several minutes.

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.

It happened to me also.

Same thing happened to me.

Jaharvis said that what he wanted to believe altered his initial statement.

Why on earth would the defense agree to such a stipulation? Why not force the State to put the actual ME on the stand?

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

As long as jury is out while they argued about how much to let them hear of his original answer to a newsie about not being sure if it was Trayvon, they're going to leave them out while they try to bust open the evidence locker.

_________________
Took my time machine into the shop for service and they said they'd get on it first thing last week.

And...locksmith? WTF?

Because the gloves don't come off until JDN denies the motion for a JOA.

Ok, as I was trying to type when site went down - MOM heard Chip, and was confronting JF.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

They weren't considerate enough to let me in on that part.

Maybe Bao has an accent that makes him a disaster on the stand for both sides.

(or maybe he sounds like Richard freaking Burton and it's something entirely else).

_________________
Took my time machine into the shop for service and they said they'd get on it first thing last week.

Jaharvis was full of words to describe answers to the state's questions.

However, when the defense starts asking questions, J.F. doesn't know, can't remember, etc.

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.

Is O'Mara going to present a medical expert of his own?

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.

Yes, I checked and site was down. By the time I figured that out, got downforeveryoneorjustme.com up, checked and found site was down, got email open to contact Rumpole, the site was back up. Hopefully, he'll show up soon.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

I agree.

The only thing I can think of is the defense will call the ME and it will possibly make it obvious and stick out more in the jurors minds that the defense called the ME not the State and that the ME (objective evidence) helps the defense more and hurts the State's case.

If the defense doesn't call the ME either it will probably still seem odd and curious to the jury that they didn't get any information from the autopsy from the ME who preformed the autopsy.

Anyway you look at it one would think that it would seem odd to the jury and could lead them to reasonable doubt.

Could this also be why the State filed (IIRC) something to prevent the defense from bringing up the fact the State failed to call certain witnesses in their arguments?