It is currently Tue May 20, 2025 2:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
Within my notes on the Rachel testimony I had written Rachel said "in some closet - WTF????". My notes are left wanting for organization!

That is within my various notes about her selectively recorded interview with Crump, but sometimes West would jump around on her, so I'm not sure she was in a closet during that phone interview ...or why she would be if that's what she said.

Any here recall if she was in a closet then?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
My recollection of her testimony is that she said that she was in a closet for her phone interview with the Scheme Team and Gutman (but I repeat myself).

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Thank you Mr. Vereen.

I hope your defense of Rachel also applies to GZ.

witnesses will always have “inconsistencies in statements,” but that does not always mean they’re lying


http://www.mediaite.com/tv/al-sharpton- ... the-media/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:16 am
Posts: 38
Anyone have the case law handy where it was ruled that being staggered was sufficient to claim you had no reasonable way to retreat?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Common sense will tell you that being straddled by the person who is assaulting you would prevent any reasonable means of retreat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
chipbennett wrote:
My recollection of her testimony is that she said that she was in a closet for her phone interview with the Scheme Team and Gutman (but I repeat myself).

Thanks, and I apologize for having missed or plain forgot about it. Some things sink into my mind slowly, on occassion after reading it a few times!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:16 am
Posts: 38
LondoJowo wrote:
Common sense will tell you that being straddled by the person who is assaulting you would prevent any reasonable means of retreat.


Oh I know, but someone had linked a case saying that even being staggered from getting hit prevented reasonable means of escape.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
Here what I just posted in the GZ thread at Anandtech, hopefully Mr sportage will reply to it.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.ph ... ount=60464

Londo_Jowo wrote:
I have no clue why the argument of whether GZ was injured enough to justify use of force. There's are no statutes or legal precedence that sets that standard.

As I've said since early on in this thread, the jury will have to decide if GZ was justified in using force at the time he used it.

From Florida standard jury instruction 3.6(f)


Quote:
In deciding whether defendant was justified in the use of deadly force, you must judge [him] [her] by the circumstances by which [he] [she] was surrounded at the time the force was used. The danger facing the defendant need not have been actual; however, to justify the use of deadly force, the appearance of danger must have been so real that a reasonably cautious and prudent person under the same circumstances would have believed that the danger could be avoided only through the use of that force. Based upon appearances, the defendant must have actually believed that the danger was real.


Londo_Jowo wrote:
Based on John's testimony there should be no doubt at that given time GZ couldn't have reasonably feared he was potentially in grave danger and had no other choice than to shoot TM in self defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
LondoJowo wrote:
Common sense will tell you that being straddled by the person who is assaulting you would prevent any reasonable means of retreat.
Truthiness wrote:
Oh I know, but someone had linked a case saying that even being staggered from getting hit prevented reasonable means of escape.


Florida is not a duty-to-retreat state. Florida statute has no requirement that one avail oneself of a "reasonable means of escape" before using deadly force in self-defense. Thus, I would consider that entire line of debate to be moot.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:16 am
Posts: 38
I agree. It had come up so I mentioned the case law, and was met with denial that it existed.

I would have little trouble finding it again myself if I was on my PC, but on this tablet I was hoping someone would remember if being posted. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:29 pm 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57119
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
List of witnesses called in the George Zimmerman trial

http://www.cfnews13.com/content/news/cf ... n_wit.html

Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Arizona
Was the crime scene drawing used at the trial drawn by Diana Smith and turned over to FDLE for the crime scene measurements?

There are two different drawings and I wonder who did them?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:01 pm 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57119
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I am trying to provide threads for reference material.... check out other threads in the Zimmerman Forum.

Threads locked... for reference only.. but please PM any info you think should be included

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN / TRAYVON MARTIN CASE
viewforum.php?f=48



For instance:

Key Players in the Zimmerman case.
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=955&p=46287#p46287

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Truthiness wrote:
I agree. It had come up so I mentioned the case law, and was met with denial that it existed.

I would have little trouble finding it again myself if I was on my PC, but on this tablet I was hoping someone would remember if being posted. :)

It's in Florida Statute 776.012 there is no duty to retreat. Did you have any luck finding a case in the reference section?

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:16 am
Posts: 38
There was a case that was overturned iirc, and part of the ruling discussed how it was unproven the defendant was the aggressor, and that even if he was, that he was hit hard enough to make him stagger meant he had no means of reasonable retreat.

So I was trying to find that case, as it seems to set a bar for what constitutes not having a reasonable way to retreat (to emphasize that even with the absurd arguments people make that George was the aggressor, he is well beyond the standard for not having a reasonable way to retreat.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
http://www.talkleft.com/zimm/stinson.pdf

Case cited in chip's sig.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:41 pm 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57119
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
murderbythebook wrote:
I've looked at the reference threads. The answers to my questions aren't there. We do not know the distance from the keys to the body. It says nothing there about who did those sketches. I was thinking the crime scene tech did the first sketch and someone else did the second one, but who knows. There is no answer to that either. I guess I'm just missing it.

The link to reference threads was a general reminder that there are reference threads. I did not see your inquiry when I did it.

I don't understand what your problem is? Crime scene sketch with measurements was in one of State discoveries (dont ask me to link). That sketch is in the Reference threads here:

viewtopic.php?f=48&t=236&start=20#p10725


What difference does the distance of keys make? Is there a point that you have in mind?

I just did a bit of a search. Sketch is from State 2nd discovery... 284 pages. It is on page 145

http://www.clickorlando.com/blob/view/- ... uments.pdf

There may be more detail in the 284 pages... if its important.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
chipbennett wrote:
Update: I just checked. Molly West's Instragram account is public. I just followed her.

And you should see the vitriol and death threats in the comments to that picture.



FBI will be pounding on doors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Now that Alicia Martin has opened up, I wonder if Sybrina will respond.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:14 pm 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57119
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Cat fight?

:2

Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group