Crump must be spitting a whole bunch of Ebonics right now!!

If it happens they will go after businesses not houses.

I wonder how CN, PAPAPIPI, LilMissPriss and the gang are taking the DCA decision.

True. I still can't believe the trial is almost upon us. I still can't process the insanity of charging this man with murder 2.

to you, Cinnamon Toast ............(love your nic - it's my favorite snack!)

You don't know how many times the words you posted above run through my mind about this case! Mind boggling!

MOM, however, is giving the impression to the listener that the jury will have to decide who STARTED it. According to Dershowitz ... it doesn't matter who started it.

___________________________________________________________________________________

From the CNN transcript:


DERSHOWITZ: Well, it wouldn't be very relevant evidence. It would be marginally relevant.

But let me show you why this is not a civil rights case. Let's hypothesize George Zimmerman was completely wrong, that he was a racist, that he stopped this young man for all the wrong reasons. Let's assume that for a moment. But then let's assume the young man got on top of Zimmerman and started banging his head at a point where he could kill him. At that point, was George Zimmerman entitled to save his own life, even if he was the wrongdoer initially by using lethal force?

The law says yes, even without Stand Your Ground. So even though George Zimmerman, might -- I'm not saying he was -- might have been a racist who was at fault and who started this, he might still have the right of self-defense under Florida law.

Thank you so much for the welcome!

I read the coven of Traybots at JQ and I think, "Real people can't be that stupid, right?" But just the fact that this case is going to trial with this level of charges is indicative of how stupid, mindless idiocy overrules rationality each and every day in this country.

Ugh...

Many still have questions ... honest questions, but I don't think here is the place to ask them, and I'm not sure why. For some odd reason, sites have taken sides already. I haven't, but I do wonder about some "choices" made.

Seriously does anybody know where there is a two sided place where people can have a calm, truly civilized, two sided "discussion"?

I'm always willing to have a civil, two-sided conversation.

Let's start here: what evidence exists that either disproves beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman acted in self-defense, or else that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman committed second-degree murder.

I've been open to consideration of such evidence for the past year. Unfortunately, nobody has ever actually presented any such evidence.

Rumpole - I cannot believe you actually found a song called, "Mr. Crump Don't Like It" -

dmoseylou says:
June 3, 2013 at 11:37 pm

EXCELLENT Article!

The Trayvon Martin Case; Update 30: Rebuke
http://statelymcdanielmanor.wordpress.c ... 30-rebuke/

Maybe it's because I live in NJ and my parents always used to talk about the Newark riots, but I'm a little nervous about any rabid reactions that will take place if GZ is rightfully acquitted. My husband thinks I'm just a worrywart.

My sister has a loaded shotgun under her bed in her house and I have large dogs and an alarm system. We live in a lovely, suburban family town with basically zero crime. But I still worry. (Small children in the house - guess I'm on momma alert!)

I am thrilled at the DCA's decision on Nelson's ludicrous ruling re: Crunk's depo. Hopefully the trend will continue.

Somebody should make a STRONG announcement (WARNING) that rioters will be shot... or else arrested... and then shot.

It is a "Martial law/war/treason" sort of thing... it should not be available even as a threat used by grievance groups.


It amounts to TERRORISM!!!