It is currently Mon May 19, 2025 6:56 am

Board index » CRIMES AND TRIALS (Leave the gun, take the cannoli) » ARCHIVE OLD CASES » GEORGE ZIMMERMAN / TRAYVON MARTIN CASE

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 10 of 51
  [ 1006 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 51  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
LandauMurphyFan
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:14 am
Posts: 103
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/dca5_opinion.pdf

Ding ding ding ding! :26
Top
 Profile  
 
chipbennett
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
John_Galt wrote:
I will be very surprised if the jury instructions accurately reflect the law.

The court instructs you that the self-appointed neighborhood watch vigilante defendant had no legal right to get out of the car and profile the good little black child as a criminal, a fuarking punk, an azzhole that always gets away, and then pursue and kill the helpless little black honor student.

The court instructs you that profiling a poor little black honor student as a criminal, pursuing him, and shooting him in the heart with a 9 mm gun evidences a depraved state of mind.


At least I have confidence that 5DCA would vacate a conviction.

Should that happen, with a new trial ordered: since Nelson has been reassigned to civil court, would said new trial have a new judge from the criminal circuit?

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)
Top
 Profile  
 
mung
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:54 pm
Posts: 659
Judge Fudge better be real careful about how she deals with the hearings this week. It could look very bad for her if she keeps up her head in the sand mentality.
Top
 Profile  
 
LandauMurphyFan
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:14 am
Posts: 103
Psssst, Chip, didja see the 5th DCA opinion, hot off the press? Linked in my post above, but here it is again. http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/dca5_opinion.pdf

Whaddaya think? :D
Top
 Profile  
 
chipbennett
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
LandauMurphyFan wrote:
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/dca5_opinion.pdf

Ding ding ding ding! :26


Writ: GRANTED!

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
LandauMurphyFan wrote:
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/dca5_opinion.pdf

Ding ding ding ding! :26


Thanks for the scoop LMF

Lets have a headline....


BOMBSHELL


5DCA Grant Writ.. Mr Crump to be deposed

Image


:91

Mr. Crump Don't Like It


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
chipbennett
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Selected quotes from the Writ:

5DCA (unanimous) wrote:
We respectfully disagree with the trial court's analysis. First, the fact that Crump represents Martin's family does not make him "an opposing counsel." As acknowledged by Crump in his affidavit, he was not acting as a lawyer for the Staet or the defendant, nor could his interivew of Witness 8 be found to constitute trial preparation in the pending criminal case below...

However, the Shelton test does not apply where, as in the instant case, an attorney has knowledge of facts relevant to the subject matter of the litigation and is merely advising a client with respect to a related matter...

Second, we also conclude that any testimony given by Crump as to the substance of his interview of Witness 8 and the surrounding circumstances thereto would not violate the work product privilege because any privilege that may have existed was waived when Crump conducted the interview in the presence of two media representatives who subsequently aired portions of the interview on national television...

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:03 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Wow!!!! GZLegal.. is still working... they CAN post stuff still.....


So.... WHERE is 4th Discovery??



From GZ Legal Site

http://www.gzlegalcase.com/




Opinion From The Fifth District Court of Appeal Regarding Petition For Certiorari

on 03 June 2013.
The following document has been issued by the Fifth District Court of Appeal:

Opinion From The Fifth District Court of Appeal Regarding Petition For Certiorari
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/dca5_opinion.pdf

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
NastyJackEsq is Francining that the Depo will be tomorrow.....


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
murderbythebook
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Arizona
Crump must be spitting a whole bunch of Ebonics right now!! :91
Top
 Profile  
 
Analyst
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:22 pm
Posts: 127
5th DCA:

‘The information provided by Witness 8 is relevant to the determination of whether Zimmerman is guilty of second degree murder (or a lesser included offense). Should Witness 8 testify at trial, Zimmerman is entitled to discover whether such testimony is consistent with prior statements made by Witness 8 to Crump and whether such testimony was in any way influenced by the manner in which the interview in question was conducted.’

‘Finally, although not a basis of the trial court’s ruling, we reject any suggestion that Crump’s affidavit would serve as an adequate substitute for a deposition.’

_________________
Getting facts right is a fundamental requirement of morality.
- P. J. O'Rourke
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:18 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Don't blow it MOM..... DO NOT give an interview and apologise for having to depose Crump.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
murderbythebook
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Arizona
Help me out here. Did the defense say there would be a 4th discovery or is that a rumor?
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:24 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
NOT a rumour at all!!!


It exists... it HAS BEEN FILED with the court (I posted link the Clerk's Office.. Docket.)
http://www.seminoleclerk.org/CriminalDo ... 2CF001083A


It is just NOT posted for us peasants to see... either at GZLegal.. or the Court Media Advisories Site?

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
LondoJowo
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
LandauMurphyFan wrote:
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/dca5_opinion.pdf

Ding ding ding ding! :26



Yes!!!!!!!!!

Crump = :wall :41 :30

BLDR = :59 :95 :94

Team GZ = :69 :52 :26
Top
 Profile  
 
LondoJowo
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
I wonder how CN, PAPAPIPI, LilMissPriss and the gang are taking the DCA decision.
Top
 Profile  
 
JanC1955
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:00 am
Posts: 287
Location: Las Vegas
Rumpole wrote:
NastyJackEsq is Francining that the Depo will be tomorrow.....


Natalie, just STFU.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
NastyJackEsq has been assigned the task of updating the Twitter Sewer Dog Pack…


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
Rumpole
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:42 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
LondoJowo wrote:
I wonder how CN, PAPAPIPI, LilMissPriss and the gang are taking the DCA decision.



Rumpole's Mole may report in :)

See Daily Daft Thread later ;)

They are hidden away and only they and Rumpole's Mole see most of their crap

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light
Top
 Profile  
 
John_Galt
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
5th DCA rules in accordance with facts and law, how very refreshing.

Defense argued "not opposing counsel" and "work product waiver" extensively in front of Nelson. Neither Nelson or Blackwell even mentioned either argument.

Nelson should be removed from the bench.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 10 of 51
  [ 1006 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 51  Next

Board index » CRIMES AND TRIALS (Leave the gun, take the cannoli) » ARCHIVE OLD CASES » GEORGE ZIMMERMAN / TRAYVON MARTIN CASE

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group