It is currently Mon May 19, 2025 1:28 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:16 pm
Posts: 36
Rumpole wrote:
I want this circus to get started


Rumpole,

Wouldn't it be heavy irony if a gasping, wheezing prosecution -- hopelessly behind and desperately trying to keep up -- would be the ones who would plead for a continuance at this juncture?

Or to save face, maybe BALDY would have no objection if asked by Judge Nelson in re: Defense request for more time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 7:54 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
If BDLR agrees.. then No No Nanette will Grant the motion...

I am hoping he will just go into auto-flap and argue against it :95

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:22 pm
Posts: 127
John_Galt wrote:
Why doesn't the media want to talk about the red stuff in Trayvon's smoke filled cup?

I'm very curious about what it is. Does 'Purple Drank' require thermal conductivity? Are the ingredients hypergolic? Have I been making it wrong?

_________________
Getting facts right is a fundamental requirement of morality.
- P. J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:02 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
From GZ Legal Site

http://www.gzlegalcase.com/



DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN

on 24 May 2013.
The following document has been filed with the Court:

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/05 ... ine_tm.pdf





DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

on 24 May 2013.
The following has been filed with the Court:

DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/05 ... ntiary.pdf

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:07 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
From CTH.................


Oh My – Don West is “Francining” Again: Trayvon Fights With W8 – Frye Hearing, 5th DCA Ruling, Expert Witnesses….
Posted on May 24, 2013 by sundance

Image

Oh my…. Puppy Love Spat?…. “hostile and angry”….. Priceless

Don West files response to State regarding the relevancy of discovery evidence for Trayvon Martin’s background, conduct, associations, drug use, gun ownership, criminal records etc. It is, after all, a self-defense defense; Meaning the actions of the other party led to the consequences to them by the response from the other.

It’s troubling that the 5th District Court of Appeals has yet to rule on whether or not Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, can be deposed surrounding his introduction of, or manufacturing of, Witness #8, “Dee Dee”, in the State V. Zimmerman discovery phase.

What exactly is taking so long for them to determine whether or not to override Judge Nelson is unknown. The tin-foil-nutter in me thinks that the DOJ-Community Relations Service (CRS) might be playing a behind the scenes role in that determination.


....more at link (And Comments)
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... witnesses/

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:14 pm
Posts: 1124
Quote:
It’s troubling that the 5th District Court of Appeals has yet to rule on whether or not Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, can be deposed surrounding his introduction of, or manufacturing of, Witness #8, “Dee Dee”, in the State V. Zimmerman discovery phase.


IDK...I find it encouraging that they are taking the time to review everything in the Writ.

:64 :64 :64 :64 Eternal Optimism Strikes Again! :64 :64 :64 :64


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:00 am
Posts: 287
Location: Las Vegas
Rumpole wrote:
From CTH.................


Oh my…. Puppy Love Spat?…. “hostile and angry”….. Priceless

Don West files response to State regarding the relevancy of discovery evidence for Trayvon Martin’s background, conduct, associations, drug use, gun ownership, criminal records etc. It is, after all, a self-defense defense; Meaning the actions of the other party led to the consequences to them by the response from the other.

It’s troubling that the 5th District Court of Appeals has yet to rule on whether or not Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, can be deposed surrounding his introduction of, or manufacturing of, Witness #8, “Dee Dee”, in the State V. Zimmerman discovery phase.

What exactly is taking so long for them to determine whether or not to override Judge Nelson is unknown. The tin-foil-nutter in me thinks that the DOJ-Community Relations Service (CRS) might be playing a behind the scenes role in that determination.


I seriously can't make heads or tails of the "language" in those text messages. It's news to me lil Tray and darlin DD were feuding on 2.26.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:16 pm
Posts: 36
John_Galt wrote:
Another thing I noticed is the huge dark circles around Corey's eyes. I have seen that before, on people dying of renal failure.


Noticed the dark circles too, JG, and didn't immediately attribute that to end-stage kidney failure. But from personal experience with a very close friend, I think your observation is legitimate. At this point in the trial's progression, Ms. Corey, if so afflicted, would have to arrange for time-consuming dialysis treatment, and would most likely need medical leave. All this is speculation, of course, and frankly, I wouldn't wish this fate on my worst enemy.


[IANAMD. Again, this is only an observation; the dark circles may be simply due to stress and/or insomnia.]


Last edited by JB from SoCal on Fri May 24, 2013 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:48 am
Posts: 64
In the dockets I've looked at for similar petitions for certiorari, the DCA has taken months to issue its decision. Unless they would be expected to expedite the GZ decision because the trial is scheduled to begin so soon (and I don't know if they would or wouldn't), there's nothing out of the ordinary in the DCA's not ruling by now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:41 pm
Posts: 270
JanC1955 wrote:
...

I seriously can't make heads or tails of the "language" in those text messages. It's news to me lil Tray and darlin DD were feuding on 2.26.


He may be referring to text messages which he has seen, but which have been "redacted" from what's been released to the public.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:31 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
From TalkLeft...................

George Zimmerman: Continuance, Sanctions and Gag Order Sought
By Jeralyn, Section Crime in the News
Posted on Thu May 23, 2013 at 09:34:19 PM EST

Quote:
[.....]
In my opinion, the only lawyers making prejudicial comments to the media are those representing the Martin family. Today, they referred to the release of defense discovery about Trayvon Martin as "red herrings" and a "distraction." Those are comments on the evidence with a tendency to prejudice the public. The state wants it both ways. They want Crump to be considered counsel on the case for the purpose of avoiding having his deposition taken (which he is not) but they don't ask that Crump & Co adhere to the ethical rules for lawyers when making public comments.

That the state complains about O'Mara and West while giving Team Crump a pass speaks volumes about the blinders the state has donned. It's okay for lawyers associated with its side of the case to prejudice the public against the defendant, but a when the defense accurately describe pleadings and court proceedings in neutral terms, it wants a gag order.

....more at link
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/5/23 ... der-Sought

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 2:38 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
Rumpole wrote:
I want this circus to get started


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
The defense makes more headway towards exposing the scheme with each additional piece of evidence exposed. Considering all that is yet to be addressed, a little more time looks to be of value to the defense, IMO.

On another note, would not the trial automatically be delayed if the DCA has not ruled?

I recall something about the DCA putting everything on hold until they've ordered differently, but I may be wrong here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
Quote:
On another note, would not the trial automatically be delayed if the DCA has not ruled?


I think the defense has to first move for a stay in the trial court and then appeal denial of the stay to the DCA.

Quote:
I recall something about the DCA putting everything on hold until they've ordered differently, but I may be wrong here.


That is correct for a writ of prohibition to boot the trial court judge off the case, but not for a petition for cert to review a discovery order.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:48 am
Posts: 64
kbp wrote:
The defense makes more headway towards exposing the scheme with each additional peice of evidence exposed. Considering all that is yet to be addressed, a little more time looks to be of value to the defense, IMO.

On another note, would not the trial automatically be delayed if the DCA has not ruled?

I recall something about the DCA putting everything on hold until they've ordered differently, but I may be wrong here.


No, not unless the proceedings are stayed. Baldwin v. State, 20 So.3d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009):

Quote:
The filing of a petition for writ of certiorari involving a non-final order invokes this court's original jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.030. In such instances, a lower court retains "continuing jurisdiction to enter all orders, including the final order disposing of the case, unless the appellate court has entered a stay or an order that otherwise prevents further action...." Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 1.6 (Thomson West 2009). See also Fla. R.App. P. Rule 9.130(f). Here, no such stay or order existed at the time of jury selection, trial, or judgment. Therefore, the trial court retained the necessary jurisdiction to proceed with each phase of trial.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 3:13 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Isn't it funny how Traybots change their tune?
(but still not their imprinted false notions)....


"It's not true, it's not true, it's not true......"

Becomes...

"It's inadmissible"

False notions are not given up lightly.... ...but when they are finally confronted with evidence...
They are not about absorbing this new evidence (getting at the truth) They are about suppressing it so as to achieve a result (Lynching)

Image


They are in denial still, but they are clearly conceding that all of the negatives about TM ARE true!!

But, being feeble minded, they STILL don't "get it".

They were LIED to by cynical schemers.

It's past time that this lynch mob directed their attention to the real GUILTY people in this case...

The Scheme Team and their associates

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
Quote:
"It's not true, it's not true, it's not true......"

Becomes...

"It's inadmissible"


Scheme Team disciples follow the teachings of their high priest Crump.


"The only photos or videos that are relevant or admissible at trial are those of Trayvon taken the day he was shot and killed by George Zimmerman," Crump said.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:44 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Florida
JanC1955 wrote:
I seriously can't make heads or tails of the "language" in those text messages. It's news to me lil Tray and darlin DD were feuding on 2.26.

I have the same problem. Between the misspellings, ebonics, and text-language, I am not sure what
is even being said. Then, I read the comments from other people and am surprised at what they got out of them. :95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 25, 2013 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:00 am
Posts: 287
Location: Las Vegas
auscitizenmom wrote:
I have the same problem. Between the misspellings, ebonics, and text-language, I am not sure what
is even being said. Then, I read the comments from other people and am surprised at what they got out of them. :95


Same here! I've since learned the trouble-in-paradise tweets are redacted, so we're not as clueless as we thought. The reason we know they were bickering is thanks to West's "Francining" in his latest motion in response to the state. He mentions they were fighting via phone/text, I think on the final page of his motion.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group