Here's my Crumpisms video



It's very short and should be good for a laugh. It's a compilation of him struggling with the English language, and losing.

Good morning
I found a trial that Tom Owens testified in before. If someone has testified before and has been recognized as an expert would a Frye hearing be held?

Just because some court, somewhere, allowed an expert or method doesn't instantly grant it acceptability in all courts. If you read cases rejecting scientific methods based on Frye or Daubert, they often cite bunches of cases in other jurisdiction that accepted and rejected the method. See, for one example of many, People v. Jeter, 80 NY 2d 818 - NY: Court of Appeals 1992 which said spectrographic voice identification didn't meet the Frye test despite the fact that a number of courts, including several NY trial courts, had allowed it.

(The appellate decision in the Davalloo case, surprisingly, doesn't mention the issue.)

Hahaha! Affirmative Action at work.

"Her parents does not want to revere her identity."

Hahaha! Affirmative Action at work.

Just because some court, somewhere, allowed an expert or method doesn't instantly grant it acceptability in all courts. If you read cases rejecting scientific methods based on Frye or Daubert, they often cite bunches of cases in other jurisdiction that accepted and rejected the method. See, for one example of many, People v. Jeter, 80 NY 2d 818 - NY: Court of Appeals 1992 which said spectrographic voice identification didn't meet the Frye test despite the fact that a number of courts, including several NY trial courts, had allowed it.

(The appellate decision in the Davalloo case, surprisingly, doesn't mention the issue.)

Large numbers of people have formulated numerous hypothesis about the various ”W8 factors”. The entire construct of the Benjamin Crump deposition is structurally framed around the Crump presentation of the W8 narrative.

That’s why the 5th DCA decision to allow deposition (override trial judge Nelson), or support the judge Nelson ruling (barring deposition), carries so much weight. The 5th DCA delivers rulings on Fridays.

This is more than just a bit of a big deal. It’s a Joe Biden moment.

Simultaneously, we have independently been on the Keyser Soze trail for quite a long time. A very LONG TIME.

We are now confident we have discovered “keyser soze”, yes, you read that right. Only we are going to hold back on the information until after the 5th DCA ruling – and, if the ruling is successful, – just before the Crump Deposition(s) take place.

Two key people travelled to Jacksonville in November of 2012.

They were both requested to appear at the behest of The State of Florida Prosecution team, Angela Corey and Bernie De La Rionda. Two people. But, oddly, no-one asks why?

The State met one of those people, W8, during their interview on April 2nd, 2012.

……But they requested appearance in Jacksonville, four months later, by two people. W8 and one other.

Two people.

The same two people who were present during the 3/19/12 phone interview with Benjamin Crump and ABC.

The Same two people who’s collaborated on this written page

[ "Dee Dee Letter" exhibit B]

TWO PEOPLE.

YOU KNOW ONE (well, kinda, as W8).

WE NOW KNOW THE OTHER.