11:12 a.m. ET: ABC informed the defense that they only recorded five and half minutes of the interview.
11:10 a.m. ET: Rionda is asking West whether the defense has requested recordings ABC made of an interview between Crump and Witness 8. West said O'Mara has been in contact with ABC, and they said they only recorded part of the interview.
11:06 a.m. ET: West said he could understand more of the content on the better quality recording, but he believes the content was the same on both recordings.
11:05 a.m. ET: West said eventually the defense got another recording that was a better quality, and the content seemed to be same in both recordings.
11:03 a.m. ET: West said one recording of the interview between Crump and Witness was of extremely poor quality.
10:59 a.m. ET: Rionda wants to know what evidence West has that Martin family attorney Crump redacted a recording of an interview with Witness 8. West said he did not say he redacted something on that recording.
10:58 a.m. ET: West said witness 8's name was released to the defense at the beginning of discovery.
10:55 a.m. ET: West agreed with Rionda that there has been an effort in this case to not release witness information to public.
10:54 a.m. ET: Rionda said bloggers misidentified a woman as Witness 8, and Zimmerman's defense website issued a bulletin said people were wrong and they knew the true identity of the woman. West said he remembered the website issuing that statement, and it wasn't that long ago.
10:51 a.m. ET: West is now talking about how the defense learned about the identity of Witness 8.
10:48 a.m. ET: Rionda seems frustrated with West, and has raised his voice several times when questioning him.
10:46 a.m. ET: Rionda is asking West about a letter Witness 8 turned over to both the defense and prosecution at the same time. West said he asked Rionda when he found out about the letter, but he wouldn't answer the question.
10:43 a.m. ET: O'Mara has finished his questioning of his co-counsel West. Rionda is now cross-examining West now.
10:41 a.m. ET: West said Witness 8 told the prosecution she lied about going to hospital during a meeting last August.
10:38 a.m. ET: West is walking through a timeline that documents the defense's issues with receiving evidence from Rionda including Martin's hospital records and photos of Zimmerman's injuries from the night of the shooting.
10:35 a.m. ET: West is accusing Rionda of not responding to the defense's discovery requests. West said the defense has spent 50 to 100 hours dealing with issues related to the prosecution's discovery violations.
10:32 a.m. ET: West said the prosecution did not release the fact that witness 8 lied about going to the hospital until months after they had learned that she had not told the truth. He is now detailing how much the prosecutions discovery violations have cost the defense.
10:28 a.m. ET: O'Mara is asking West when he first thought witness 8 was lying about going to the hospital after Martin was shot. West said he thought very early on he thought it just didn't fit.
10:26 a.m. ET: West said a report from the Federal Department of Law Enforcement or FDLE informed the defense that Rionda had met with witness 8 another time.
10:23 a.m. ET: West said that at some point the defense learned of other interviews Rionda had with witness 8.
10:21 a.m. ET: O'Mara is asking West what information was left out of the Crump interview of witness 8. West said the defense was not told that Crump helped transport the witness to the interview, and some of Martin's family members were present.
10:18 a.m. ET: West said the defense got a recording of an interview of another witness conducted by Rionda that was also redacted or edited. He also said the defense had to request unredacted recordings.
10:16 a.m. ET: West said after filing motions the defense finally got an unredacted recording of the conversation.
10:14 a.m. ET: West said the first recording of Crump's interview the defense received from the prosecution seemed to be edited and redacted of any identifying information for witness 8.
10:11 a.m. ET: O'Mara is asking West about a discovery issue with witness 8. West said there was a recording of Martin family attorney Ben Crump talking with witness 8, and the defense became aware of the recording through different reports. Witness 8 is Martin's ex-girlfriend who was on the phone with him around the time he was shot.
10:10 a.m. ET: West is testifying about his work experience, and his history with Zimmerman's case.
10:08 a.m. ET: Nelson is now trying to determine whether there was a discovery violation. Defense attorney West is taking the witness stand to testify about the prosecution's alleged discovery violation.
10:04 a.m. ET: O'Mara said prosecutors have attacked his reputation, and these proceedings need to be respectful to each other because the world is watching. People could lose respect from the system if they witness the attorneys bicker according to O'Mara.
10:01 a.m. ET: O'Mara is asking Nelson to sanction the prosecution for discovery violations. He said the prosecution's actions were unethical.
9:58 a.m. ET: O'Mara is asking for the settlement documents between the Martin family and the home owner's association for the neighborhood where Martin was shot. Judge Nelson said she would give the defense access to documents under court seal preventing it from being released to the public.
9:54 a.m. ET: Zimmerman is done answering questions from judge Nelson. The attorneys are at a sidebar now.
9:53 a.m. ET: Here is a transcript of Nelson's Q&A with Zimmerman:
udge: “The state of Florida provides a procedure where by you may file a pretrial motion for immunity and at that motion hearing, the defense bears the burden of proof. Do you understand that?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And are you familiar with chapter 776.032 and that’s known as the Stand Your Ground statute of immunity. Are you familiar with that statute?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And without telling me any substance of any conversations that you’ve had with any of your lawyers, but have you had conversations with them about filing an immunity motion and having a pretrial hearing?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And are you aware that council previously stated that they were going to file a pretrial motion and request a separate immunity hearing?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And that the court had set the deadline for filing any of those motions in a previous court order and that was April 26, 2013. Are you aware of that?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And in addition to that the court, in anticipation, had set aside two weeks in April for an immunity hearing. Are you aware of that?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And then prior to that date, council announced to the court that he will not be filing a pretrial immunity motion. Are you aware of that?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And that was discussed with you?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And you’re also aware that no such motion has been filed, is that correct?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And that matter was discussed with you also?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “Do you consent with council’s decision to not file a pretrial immunity motion?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “And do you consent to council’s not requesting a pretrial immunity hearing?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “Is it your decision to not file the pretrial immunity motion?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
Judge: “Is it your decision to not have a pretrial immunity hearing?”
Zimmerman: “After consultation with my council, yes your honor.”
Judge: “Has anyone promised you anything to get you to make this decision?”
Zimmerman: “No, your honor.”
Judge: “Has anybody threatened you?”
Zimmerman: “No, your honor.”
Judge: “Is your decision freely and voluntarily and knowingly made?”
Zimmerman: “Yes, your honor.”
9:52 a.m. ET: Zimmerman said the defense will not file a request for a pre-trial immunity hearing, and it is his decision to not to pursue a pre-trial hearing.
|