It is currently Mon May 19, 2025 5:18 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 914 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 46  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:51 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Thanks for the link Taurus......

Need to read and see some legal opinions :)

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:11 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
From the CTH.......

Summary:

Image

STATE RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI = HARMLESS (Mostly)

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:20 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Reminder


As well as this DAILY discussion thread about the GZ case... there is also

DAILY DAFT POSTS FROM JUSTARSE QUEST
viewtopic.php?f=45&t=822&p=33607#p33607


Image
If only Trayvon had kept his hands in his pockets, none of this would have happened.

Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
I do agree what Nejames is saying ..as a matter of fact I happen to believe the only reason George was arrested and charged were for the very same reasons. *Spark Protests*, and IMO, racial unrest.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
Quote:
According to the United States Census Bureau, Seminole County had a population of 430,838 people in 2012, which means residents have less than one percent of a chance - .116 percent - of getting one of those jury summons.


Do you have to be stupid to be a reporter? Jury pool is pulled from driver license and state ID records, and you have to be at least 18 years of age. So why is reporter calculating based on census record of the entire population?


Quote:
You must be a U.S. citizen at least 18 years of age, a resident of the State of Florida and Seminole County, and possess a license or identification card issued by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. If you do not possess a driver's license and would like to serve as a juror, please contact the Jury Manager at (407) 665-4392, or visit the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court located in the Seminole County Courthouse at 301 N. Park Avenue, Sanford, FL 32771.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:47 pm
Posts: 301
"Florida Captain to Get Rank Back After Facebook Rant"

http://www.firehouse.com/news/10928275/ ... ebook-rant

From the article:

April 24--A Miami-Dade firefighter demoted last year for ranting on Facebook about the Trayvon Martin case should get his captain's rank back, an arbitrator has ruled, rebuffing Mayor Carlos Gimenez, who had insisted on the punishment.

"Mayor Gimenez testified that he interceded in the instant case because the news media had given Mr. Beckmann's Facebook posting nationwide and intensive coverage," the arbitrator wrote.

Trayvon's mother, Sybrina Fulton, is a longtime employee of Miami-Dade's public housing and community development department. Fulton, who met briefly with Gimenez last year after Beckmann's demotion, has taken an unpaid leave of absence since February.

Also

On his personal Facebook page, Beckmann bashed prosecutor Angela Corey, who charged George Zimmerman of Sanford with second-degree murder in Trayvon's death. Zimmerman has claimed self-defense.

"Listening to Prosecutor Corey blow herself and her staff for five minutes before pre-passing judgment on George Zimmerman," Beckmann's post read.

"The state seeks reelection again, truth aside. I and my co-workers could rewrite the book on whether urban youths are victims of racist profiling or products of their failed, sh--bag, ignorant, pathetic, welfare dependent excuses for parents, but like Mrs. Corey, we speak only the truth.( :Gslap )

Full article at link


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:55 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Reminder


As well as this DAILY discussion thread about the GZ case... there is also

DAILY DAFT POSTS FROM JUSTARSE QUEST
viewtopic.php?f=45&t=822&p=33720#p33720


Image
If only Trayvon had kept his hands in his pockets, none of this would have happened.

Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Defense adds five additional witnesses.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... losure.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
O'Mara pulls no punches in responding to BDLR's Shakespeare-laced excuse for a Response to Motion to Sanction:

O'Mara wrote:
It is for that reason undersigned counsel requests this Court strike this referenced pleading, and further requests this Court enter whatever additional sanctions it deems appropriate.


This one will brighten your Friday.

(h/t: Ejarra)

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
chipbennett wrote:
This one will brighten your Friday.


Indeed it did. Wow. I wonder if MOM copied the Florida attorney regulation division with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
taurus wrote:
Defense adds five additional witnesses.

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... losure.pdf


M-DSPD ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:12 pm
Posts: 50
chipbennett wrote:
O'Mara pulls no punches in responding to BDLR's Shakespeare-laced excuse for a Response to Motion to Sanction:


Finally, a strong and direct pleading by O'Mara. Normally, IMHO, he beats around the bush too much, and his arguably good points get diluted.
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:33 am
Posts: 5
Thanks John Galt for clearing the air about what makes a qualified Person to be put on the Jury list. The local population as such has nothing to do with it .Good grief. I am just an ignorant civilian ,not a seasoned reporter and I understood this already


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:18 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Welcome to RT Canadacan :51


:rose

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Yet another document posted at GZLegal..... supplementary from Crump :doh

From GZ Legal Site

http://www.gzlegalcase.com/

http://www.gzlegalcase.com/index.php/di ... -discovery



DEMANDS FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY

on 26 April 2013.
The following documents have been filed with the Court:

DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY (Trayvon Martin's Phone)
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... demand.pdf

DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY (Enhanced Audio)
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... mand_2.pdf



REDACTED MOTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL WITNESS DISCLOSURE

on 26 April 2013.
The following document has been filed with the Court:

REDACTED MOTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL WITNESS DISCLOSURE

http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... losure.pdf



Defense Documents in Regards to Motions for Sanctions

on 26 April 2013.
The following documents have been filed with the Court:

REPLY TO STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... ctions.pdf

AFFIDAVIT AS TO REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... t_fees.pdf



Amended Notice of Hearing for April 30, 2013

on 26 April 2013.
The following document has been filed with the Court:

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... 3013_2.pdf




STATE'S MOTION OBJECTING TO RELEASE OF VICTIM'S FAMILY PERSONAL INFORMATION

on 26 April 2013.
The following documents have been filed with the Court:

STATE'S MOTION OBJECTING TO RELEASE OF VICTIM'S FAMILY PERSONAL INFORMATION & MOTION TO SEAL THE RECORDS PREVIOUSLY FILED
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/st ... y_info.pdf

STATE'S AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/st ... 043013.pdf



SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM

on 26 April 2013.
The following document has been filed with the Court by Mr. Crump:

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO UNSEAL
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0413/04 ... s_memo.pdf

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:09 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
The Crump Supplement

Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:08 pm
Posts: 42
I love it. His arguments are that there is case law in which the Fl SC has said such civil agreements are inadmissible in criminal cases, and that the agreement is immaterial to the case. For arguments sake, lets say that his cites are relevant, did he forget that he was the one that filed this document? If he knew the filing to be inadmissible and immaterial, why then did he file it? To waste the court's time? As a PR stunt? What was the motivation? Even by his own argument, for the attorneys here, wouldn't that be contempt of court in any other court room? Looks like his stunt backfired, and he is trying to shove the toothpaste back into the tube.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 288
:Gslap :Gslap :Gslap Still laughing over your post, Red. This is going to be a free for all on Tuesday. I suggest that even Nelson may be getting a glimmer that supporting Bernie at George's Defense expense is getting her into the soup. Will be interested to see if Blackwell is still in the game. Not sure he signed up for the Appeal Court. Hope the Crumpster will be there. Bernie should be flapping at high speed at this court appearance and might take off into the wild blue yonder. Although, the Traybots would never admitt it, Bernie's non existent lawyering skills are going to be front and center.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:45 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Mr. Crump Don't Like It - Beale Street Sheiks (Stokes and Sane) 1927



_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
WrongonRed wrote:
I love it. His arguments are that there is case law in which the Fl SC has said such civil agreements are inadmissible in criminal cases


He doesn't even recognize the difference. Everything cited in Crump's supplemental memorandum pertains solely to civil cases.

Cited statutes and case law appear to have nothing whatsoever to do with the criminal case.

90.408 and 768.041 clearly pertain only to a civil case.

As is obvious from the caption, the Saleeby opinion also pertained to a civil case.

http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xm ... _11071.xml

Crump's Bubble Burst:

http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xm ... -1986-2006


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 914 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 46  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group