I dunno, maybe a test filing: "Scheme Team Confession"

Oh, someone please try it. Maybe some Shakespeare CC'd to BDLR and Crump.

Hope yer maths is right

I'll add those dates to the Case Calendar...

Zimmerman Case Calendar:
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=747&p=30573#p21249

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

By all means!

Is it not the State's response on Apr 28?

I would think Crump would be unable to even file anything @ DCA on this case.

Quite right... I got carried away ... i'll fix.

Or did I... It seems Crump and Blackwell are to respond?

No I think it is State


I guess my confusion stems from Crump's status as "Opposing Counsel"


But thanks I have changed Calendar to show "State"

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Confused? I can't imagine why.

They are ALL part of THE Scheme.... Kabuki Theatre on Steroids

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

I was looking at your calendar, and if I am not incorrect the Writ stays the proceedings. Meaning that the schedule is shot to hell. Until a resolution is arrived at by the DCA. Just a heads up.

Staying the proceedings works for me!

(Sorry about your calendar, Rumpole.)

Nobody has said there is a stay.... so I assume there is not.

Fräulein Nelson has refused to extend any deadlines so far.

If she does... Calendar can be amended.... we have the technology.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Issuance of a show cause order on a petition for writ of prohibition (like when they booted Lester) stays proceedings.
FRAP 9.100(h). I don't think a show cause order on a petition for cert stays proceedings. I think they would have to move Nelson to stay and then appeal her denial of the stay to the DCA. FRAP 9.310

According to the Order, "Respondent in the above-styled cause shall file with this Court and show cause...why the Petition for Writ of Certiorari...should not be granted." And at the top of the Order, the Petitioner is identified as George Zimmerman while the Respondent is identified as the State of Florida. So that's pretty clear.

I'm sure the Crumpster is devastated not to be included, but perhaps BDLR can ask him for input. Oh wait, that might actually require Crump to have knowledge of something other than shakedowns and blackmail. Don't hold your breath on that one, Bernie.

Yes.
I have amended the Calendar to show "State" and not Crump.

But as discussed at CTH.. it is possible (likely) that Crump/Blackwell will have some input, perhaps major "off the record" with BDLR.

They are all co-counsel colleagues after all

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Since the petition is in effect disputing Nelson's ruling(s)...... can she file some sort of response/explanation?

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

I assume colleges = colleagues? (Yeah, I know, it's late in NZ...)

In Judge Nelson's world, it appears that they're colleagues of some sort. Well, after all, without Crump's...er...input, charges would never have been brought, now would they?

Pretty sure Crump / Blackwell will be filing something as intervenor, joinder, amicus or whatever.

No doubt. I'm just wondering if BDLR is again going to point to Blackwell and say "What he said." or have something of his own to add. He is, after all, the State of Florida in this case (If I understand correctly). Having Blackwell/Crump fight his battles doesn't look very good. It actually makes it look like they are teaming up vs the defense.

I think most of us agree with your comment. As an older person I do use cursive writing but not even my sons who are now in their 30s use cursive writing. It has been written by someone else and is being passed off as W8's own letter... I call BS on that.