A Response to Jonathan Capehart’s Editorials In Regards to the Zimmerman Case

Post and related stuff at link
http://www.gzlegalcase.com/index.php/press-releases

on 21 February 2013.
This month, Jonathan Capehart of The Washington Post published three opinions regarding the Zimmerman Case: The 'rabid' hate aimed at Trayvon Martin, Playing 'Games' with Trayvon Martin's image, and 'Stand Your Ground' eludes Robert Zimmerman. These three editorials draw attention to aspects of the Zimmerman Case that should be addressed; however, Mr. Capehart's positions betray his clear presumption of Mr. Zimmerman's guilt, which is fine in the context of an opinion piece, but in order to make his point, he must overlook some clear issues that are important to the broader social relevance of this case. He must also overlook the significant forensic evidence that supports George's claim of self-defense, and that FBI documents related to the civil rights investigation show no evidence that George acted in a racially motivated way that night (to the contrary, they illustrate examples of George as a non-racist who has a colorblind life philosophy). Mr. Capehart's voluntary decision to ignore this information bespeaks his willingness to craft his message without care for accuracy. Again, we understand that such is wholly allowed in an opinion piece, but we suggest his responsibility as a journalist should also impact his presentation.

The Zimmerman Case has become a flashpoint in the conversation about racial injustice. While we contest that any racial motivation played a role in the Zimmerman Case, we are compelled to use the notoriety of this case to begin a realistic, honest conversation about racial injustice. But here is a warning: to focus so intently on George Zimmerman, and to equate a civil rights victory to a Zimmerman conviction cheapens the conversation and threatens to drive us further apart. If the Zimmerman Case is to be the catalyst for conversation about race, then we owe it to ourselves to have a complete and nuanced understanding of all the factors involved.

Published on Feb 23, 2013 - pokerfacetodd
The AP is a lying news wire service that is posted to daily newspapers around the World as factual news. The fact they lie and misrepresent the actual news puts them in danger of being sued. There is no doubt, based on this news report, that the AP service is anti-George Zimmerman and they are not too afraid of legal action even though NBC is being sued for similar actions. Media bias associated press lied about this case in ways I feel puts them in legal jeopardy. Their gun control efforts failed, the SYG law is unscathed if not empowered.

rumpole2 says:
February 24, 2013 at 9:29 pm

The point is….
The manufactured evidence is part of the FOUNDATION. Sure we can ignore the foundation, we can ignore the basement altogether… lets just look at the freshly decorated 4th floor apartment .. that the State of Florida, with all of its resources, presents to the Jury. It looks pretty good! I has flashy decorations and LOTS of things to distract the Jury… LIMPapa videos run in a loop on a big screen. The walls are decorated with Papapinhead photoshop pictures… The jury can select audio replays of cretins…Teeto reciting legalese in form of “Odes to Racist”…..LiveLaughLove, dressed as a Wagnerian “fat lady” belts out “I am Trayvon” songs with insane lyrics….. there is a large cage with Cocky the Cockatoo.. It all looks fantastic… The jury buy it.

Meanwhile down in the basement there is still the rotten Scheme foundation. We all know about it….. all the people selling the 4th floor apartment know about it. But the jury does NOT.

There seems to be two competing factions. Both want to help GZ, but for different reasons. One faction wants to expose the BGI and Crump which would help GZ, as it exposed both the political aspects of the case that ended in GZ getting charged, when the evidence pointed to a different action.

The other just feels that GZ has been railroaded and should not have been charged but are more concerned with applying the law equally and seeing that justice is done. This group wants to help GZ the BGI, Crump is secondary unless it helps GZ. The first group wants to help GZ only as it helps to expose the BGI and their tactics. GZ is a means toward a that goal.

So now comes the problem, the BGI has its protectors and they are not going doing without a fight. GZ's defense team does not have the resources to both bring down the BGI and defend itself. While bringing down the BGI would help him, its time for the defense to concentrate on others ways to help the case.

I am doing just that here:
My quote:

Ejarra at 5:44 PM February 23, 2013
"Since you brought up the word ASSUME, let's go over facts instead of assuming. You said PURSUE. There is ZERO evidence of this, only what is chanted by Crump. You said the police advised Georgie not to pursue. NOT TRUE. Sean, NOT POLICE, advised him not to follow to which Georgie agreed. Georgie never talked to the police that night until after the incident. Sean did in fact, TWICE asked to let him know if Mr. Martin does anything else; which is why he had to get out of his car to try an keep an eye on him. You do NOT know that Mr. Martin did NOT intend to murder Georgie, which is another ASSUMPTION.
One last piece of information. Mr. Martin DID NOT have a can of ICE TEA with him that night. Do you know what it was? Also, why was the can removed from the bag at the time he attacked Georgie?"

Since we speak of changing the IMPRINTING, this calling out the false narrative, in the press on comment pages is a place to start.

Ejarra
I went to OS and spent a few minutes doing what you were suggesting, I notice something odd. For example on Micah25 if you looked at his likes and dislikes, his dislikes were usually 0 or 1, but as soon as you clicked the dislike button, the number of dislikes jumps up. The opposite was happening on Rockymtnmama you click in like which were low, afterwards the likes would show a larger number. This could be a coincidence of course, but I checked other areas and there was no difference, accurate numbers.