Daily Daft Posts from Justarse Quest.I have mentioned before the Trayvon Zone inmates BULLY anybody with a pro GZ opinion.
They can not see the irony of their claims to be "anti-bullying" and yet bullies themselves.. especially the site Madam.
They have driven all opposing views away.. banned them, or bullied them so much they no longer post in the Trayvon Zone. A poor newbie has stumbled in and been set upon by the Rabid pack of dogs just for saying.....
“I think both sides of this case throw just as much BS as the other. I don't see a difference”
One brief post from a rare reasonable poster, but that just inspires an alpha cretin to attack….. then the pack join in.
cowboy john wrote:
I think both sides of this case throw just as much BS as the other. I don't see a difference.
Luke Davis wrote:
How refreshing to hear that opinion
ATTACK (for claiming to see both sides?)Teeto wrote:
For those who do not support Justice for Trayvon, I know of another site that might be more interesting. Just sayin....
Cowboy John wrote:
Teeto, you don't see BS flying on both sides? I don't support either one as to how this case is going so far. How can you even post what you did? I have no reason to fight with you.
Flutter(to cowboy john) wrote:
I asked this before, but perhaps it was overlooked -- what, in your opinion, BS is the Martin family or the prosecution throwing around?
Cowboy John wrote:
I don't like being baited. I stand by my post. BS flies on both sides. Don't take it so personally. I said both sides
.
Cowboy John wrote:
I never said anything about families. I was talking about posters
Angie (to cowboy john) wrote:
I personally don't see any BS flying on here, just standing up for Truth & Justice.
Well apart from the occasional Trolls, LOL. Just my 2cents.
We all love Teeto's very insightful posts as well.
Teeto wrote:
In keeping with the TOS, I do not see the word "YOU" in my comment. That being said, NO, I do not see "BS flying on both sides". I see a group of people on this thread that have spent 8 long months reviewing the evidence as it is released...discussing it reasonably..and coming to a conclusion that the prosecution has made the right charge, possibly under-charged, against GZ and that justice will be served upon a jury pronouncing GZ guilty.
I hardly call any of that BS and I take great offense to anyone suggesting otherwise, and especially someone who comes to the thread, indicates they have not really been following the case and then makes such a cavalier statement. I do not consider my position to be "fighting" but merely an opinion that I choose to express on behalf of myself and my fellow Trayvon Warriors.
Please stick broadly to GZ case in this thread.To discuss JQ, go toviewtopic.php?f=45&t=63&p=19717#p19717