From WaPo (paywall)...
Divergence Between Barr and Horowitz on Origin of Trump Investigation…. Quote:
The Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, is due to release his long-awaited findings in a week, but behind the scenes at the Justice Department, disagreement has surfaced about one of Horowitz’s central conclusions on the origins of the Russia investigation. The discord could be the prelude to a major fissure within federal law enforcement on the controversial question of investigating a presidential campaign.
Barr has not been swayed by Horowitz’s rationale for concluding the FBI had sufficient basis to open an investigation on July 31, 2016, these people said.
Quote:
Sundance
I’ll be the first person who will call out the IG for whitewashing the findings of his investigation depending on the evidence he outlines or hides. Horowitz did that with the 2018 report on DOJ/FBI activity in the Clinton email investigation. However, that said, I’m also the first person to say ignore the media, and let’s wait and see the actual report.
Quote:
Road Runner
Sundance, while I presume the ‘body’ of the IG report will reveal many acts of a criminal nature as to the FISA filings, I also presume that the IG’s summary will sugar coat most of it…
My question to you is when do you predict Durham will begin dropping his findings/indictments?
Who is likely to be the first "Big name" indictment?
When?
What will the crime be?
I see a CTH poster who may well "get it"
Quote:
Comrade Mope
“Horowitz is looking at whether the DOJ and FBI complied with internal DOJ/FBI rules and processes during their FISA application and use within the FISA court.”
Or as Obama said: “By the book.”
A "review" by an Inspector General is primarily designed to look at "in-house" procedures. It is NOT a Criminal investigation. The IG does not have the power to Compel testimony (even from employees), and can not call on witnesses outside the Government entity being reviewed, nor can he compel (subpoena) the production of documents (as evidence).
Chris Farrell (Judicial Watch) describes OIG reviews generally as "the place where the truth goes to die" and Horowitz's other recent OIG reports have confirmed that.
I do WANT there to be masses of indictments... but for reasons I have outlined before... the real crimes involve sever penalties, and involve many very highly placed Washington Officials and politicians. I get the impression that there has been a decision to NOT expose all that and so cause extreme civil unrest.
I do not THINK Barr and Durham will be indicting anybody for the real crimes... maybe some minor crimes (and process crimes)
Even though "Eyes on Q".. still cites ...134,570 Sealed Cases
#BIBLICAL
https://twitter.com/EyesOnQ/status/1201687205992976385 