Roger Stone persecution.... Apparently Roger Stone's lawyers are requesting the (mythical) "Crowd Strike" report(s) on their investigation of the DNC severs which allegedly show "Russian Hacking" of those servers... The government response looks to me to be an admission that Crowd Strike did little investigation at all... and if they did find any evidence they did not show it to FBI or DOJ.
FBI were denied access, but Mueller and all accepted that "Muh Russians" hacked the DNC. No proof ever seen .. so no basis for any of the "Muh Russians hackers"... no basis for theMueller indictment of 12 Russian agents... no basis for the Intelligence report (claimed to be 17 agencies, when it was 3 in cahoots.. and only generalizations, not concrete claims) that Russians meddled in the election... It was all crap even if a DNC paid Company actually did an investigation... and it seems they did NOT do an investigation at all... at least they found nothing that was evidence presented in any report
It seems that Crowd Strike reports are NOT about evidence that there WAS a hack... but rather just BS about steps taken after DNC stuff was LEAKED to stop (Imaginary) Russian hacks going forward...
...information regarding what remediation steps CrowdStrike took to remove the Russian threat from the system and strengthen the DNC and DCCC computer systems against subsequent attacks is not relevant to these charges. And, in any case, the government does not need to prove at the defendant’s trial that the Russians hacked the DNC in order to prove the defendant made false statements, tampered with a witness, and obstructed justice into a congressional investigation regarding election interference.The old DODGE... Claiming Stone "obstructed justice" when their was no underlying crime (Muh Russian Hacking)
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL UNREDACTED CROWDSTRIKE REPORTS; US v. Stone; 1:19-cr-00018https://www.scribd.com/document/4134289 ... ke-Reports
