It is currently Sun May 18, 2025 8:19 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1091 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:20 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Thanks... not my word... but I did apply it :24


There really were a group of women during the French Revolution who liked to sit and watch executions while they Knitted.... The word actually means "knitting woman"

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:58 am
Posts: 73
Location: OZTRAILEYAA
Rumpole wrote:
The point is/was.......

..... that.....

Trayvon was NOT just a little child... on his way back from the shops with sweeties for his little bother :24


George was not a White Racist out to shoot any old black kid.


The story put out is a LIE!!!!

There is ONLY GZ's version of events... and that is backed up by ALL the witnesses (what little they saw and heard)

You HAVE to accept that version unless there is some evidence of another... and there is not.

so..................... what you may have read is UNTRUE

[b]The gun thing is NOT the norm in Australia (or NZ)...



:15



OK OK OK OK OK I should have researched it a bit better b4 i opened my keyboard I KNOW I KNOW OK I GOT IT :91


MY Last word on the whole thing GNS the think i hate about the guns debate is that a gun has the propensity to kill multiple ppl at one time unlike someone hitting my head into the concrete unless of course u r an ocytopus

YES I KNOW ITS LEGAL IN USA I KNOW ALL THAT but ur so right there is only one GZ 's story so far BUT I dont HAVE TO ACCEPT ANYTHING it could have been the damm ALIENS came and shot the christ out of the black kid and then tried to shoot at GZ and then they all fell down i dont HAVE to ACCEPT ANYTHING BECAUSE ITS ON THE INTERNET IN THE PAPERS OR ANYTHING ELSE I CAN BE AS oppostional as i want


and what i may have read may be true too ? I gotta say i know more about the extintion of pubic hair in the USA than i know about this case so im slinking off to the :8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:46 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
K Starry... and it is fair enough to debate the gun law....

But that is a whole 'nother issue.

The people of Florida .. and USA generally... do have that debate

For this case GZ had a legal weapon. He did shoot in self defence.

He has told a consistent story!!! It is another myth that he has not. Eye witness accounts.. especially of traumatic events...... usually do show variations..... A word perfect version every time is actually indicative of remembering a script and LYING...

Some where back I quoted Jeralyn Merrit.. lawyer who described the variations as about what you would expect... the overall scenario is consistent!!


Yes... you are on to something with Space Aliens... I did actually present that theory way back in this thread (I'll go find it)
It does prove the point that if you are just going to make stuff up.. then Alien abduction is as good as any other made up story (ref most posters at JQ) They have people hearing 4 accomplishes and a rampant cockatoo... as well as seeing ghostly figures in the Clubhouse :31

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:52 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Reposting from some time ago


Rumpole wrote:
Well I think this is clearly a case of "Alien abduction" gone horribly wrong!
(Everyone is entitled to an opinion doncha know!!)

Dear, sweet, innocent child, Trayvon was skipping home... splashing playfully in rain puddles.

Not a care in world... on his way home from the shops having spent some of his pocket money.

Aside: Trayvon worked hard at his home "chores" to earn his weekly $5.00 pocket money, but his only thought was to buy a watermelon drink and some sweeties for his little "brother". He planed to donate the rest of his pocket money to his favourite charity, as he always did.

Along comes overweight George (Gorgon) Zimmerman. He looks pretty weird and anybody can see he clearly matches the profile of a VENUSIAN!!!. An evil alien race well known for snatching cute little boys off the street... but strangely enough not known for simply blowing them away?


I think George reached for his transporter zapper.... but got confused and grabbed his gun by mistake? It's obvious if you look at the evidence and what all the witnesses heard and all. George was on prescription psychotropic drugs at the time and Venusians go nuts on those. I'm sure. Besides.... Venusians who join NW are mostly bad bastards.

All Venusians are liars... THAT is proven by the fact nobody knows about them and all the abducting they do. So George would have bashed himself on the head before the cops got there. Lucky they didn't search him and find his Transporter Zapper!!

It all fits. It makes me mad when people can't see how innocent Trayvon was and what an evil Venusian George is. :59

The only thing I don't understand is....
Clearly George set out to hunt down and abduct Trayvon. (kill him as it turns out) So WHY did he call the cops? He stayed on phone with them and KNEW they were minutes (perhaps seconds) away. Why would he risk doing ANYTHING to Trayvon?
Venusians sure are dumb!

Tragedies like this could be avoided if Venusians just stayed in their spaceships!!

Image


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:58 am
Posts: 73
Location: OZTRAILEYAA
:91


:15



ROFLMAO :91 as good as any other story


yep the gun debate is another entirely inflammatory topic


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:37 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I have moved a few more posts to the daily discourse/Introduction thread

http://randomtopics.org/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=63&p=14900#p14900

I too struggle.. but I would like to try and stick to the GZ case here.. rather than other forum posters etc. :24

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
A Must read, if anyone cares to know the truth.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... more-48410


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:47 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Thanks Taurus

Sampling from the article......


These People Never Met Each Other – Therein Lies The Misunderstanding of Viewership
Posted on September 16, 2012 by sundancecracker

George Zimmerman never met Trayvon Martin.

George Zimmerman never met Trayvon Martin; at least not the Trayvon Martin the media has introduced people to.

George Zimmerman never met the 12-year-old pee-wee football player who was described by his teacher as “majoring in cheerfulness”.

That “child” was never in the life of George Zimmerman. The child yearning for Skittles and Iced Tea the media describes, was never present on the night of February 26th 2012. So who did George meet?

George Zimmerman met a six foot two inch, 160 lb, young man.

George met a 17-year-old troubled teenager who was missing any substantive adult in his life to understand him, engage with him, monitor him and deliver guidance to him. George met the outcome of two detached and divorced parents who choose to view their son, Trayvon, as a task. A task to be managed.

George met the legally dependent son of Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin.

George also met the step-son of Alicia Martin, whose husband, Tracy, Sybrina’s ex and Trayvon’s “dad”, was having a long-term affair with his now pregnant girlfriend Brandi Greene.

George met the son of a father whose chosen decision, while in a guardianship of his son because of a 10-day third time school suspension for drug possession, was to leave him unsupervised in the home of his girlfriend, and her 12-year-old son, Chad; while he and Brandi went to a downtown sportsbar for dinner.

Indeed, George Zimmerman met the 17-year-old outcome of unsupervised, undisciplined and unguided parenting.
....snip.....
So, given this, given all of this, is it any wonder why the public are not able to reconcile the differences between what took place, and what the media is describing?

I mean, is it really surprising things seem disconnected when you converse with anyone about this case? Even the people being eloquently described in the media as relations have never actually met each other.

So how could anyone expect an unattached observing public to actually, honestly, and reasonably understand who the characters are, and how their behavior might not align with the truthful script.

It’s almost like a Trademarked Hollywood Movie Story or something.

.... more at link
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... more-48410

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:52 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Maybe somebody should send a copy to Judge Nelson? Certainly I think O'Mara might well present some of that narrative ... with the facts to back it up.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Repeating a point or two.

I see debate over GZ's injuries continues.

1.They look serious to me, but people persist in minimising them. If I was on my way to the store.. it would be a SERIOUS matter to end up with those injuries.

2. Self defence does not require you take a beating.. and only react when injuries reach a certain point of seriousness. NO INJURIES would not negate the right to self defence.... and here we do have some injuries.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:16 am
Posts: 710
The injuries are significant. How many strikes against the concrete did it take to open the skin? GZ said his head was banged many times and it certainly looks like it to me. And don't forget the broken nose and swollen head which was commented on by Singleton the next day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
flgirl543 wrote:
Sundance's post is, for the most part, right on the money. Amazing Tracy has been able to carry this fraud this far. And the picture of Sybrina...she doesn't appear much younger than she is now...why would a "God fearing woman" take a photo posing like that?

I really believe there has to be people who are close to this family who know the truth. It's amazing none have come forward, but I guess they all have to stick together. Afterall, it's "us" against "them", you know...and then there's the fear of reprecussions...look what happened to GZ's friend, Joe Oliver.


I do still worry.

There was a big "political" push to get GZ charged... special prosecutor and bypassing the GJ etc. Then all the propaganda that ensued.

It seems clear to "us" that the case should be dismissed... but will it?

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:37 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Rumpole wrote:
Repeating a point or two.

I see debate over GZ's injuries continues.

1.They look serious to me, but people persist in minimising them. If I was on my way to the store.. it would be a SERIOUS matter to end up with those injuries.

2. Self defence does not require you take a beating.. and only react when injuries reach a certain point of seriousness. NO INJURIES would not negate the right to self defence.... and here we do have some injuries.



Remembered what else I was gonna say...

3. GZ's version is the only version we have. It could be disputed if there was a witness who saw the fight from the outset.. but there is no such witness. And of course such a witness may well support GZ's version anyway. Certainty the limited amount that witnesses saw and heard DOES support GZ.
People are making up alternative versions.... I guess the prosecution will have a version for their opening statement... but they need more than that... the have to present evidence to prove it. GZ COULD sit back and say nothing.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:51 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I see some talk about "Dee Dee" again... *SIGH*

The girl has language problems.... hard to understand at all.... and like it or not, she comes across as none to bright. That may be unfair... but it is how she comes across.
Language problems do make it hard to communicate with the jury.. and it's not as if an "Interpreter" can be used in this case.

Besides... all we have heard so far are statements made to sympathetic interviewers (Crump and BDLR). People who nit pick "inconsistencies" in GZ's statements.. ...it these inconsistency critics are consistent themselves..... I am sure will have a field day once Dee Dee has been interviewed and cross examined... eg for depositions.

AND.....
Besides all that..... Dee Dee's account to me.. can be broadly reconciled with GZ's story.... it is hardly the "smoking gun" in this case.

Quote Rumpole
Witness #8 (Dee Dee) was clearly coached prior to her testimony.. and a lot of the questioning by BDLR was leading (to say the least)... so I imagine there will be some changes to her testimony once subject to more rigorous deposition interview.
I am not sure her testimony will be used at trial at all, and if it is there may be significant changes to details.

However, taking Dee Dee's testimony as we have it now, Jeralyn Merritt (TalkLeft) has made the effort to reconcile her testimony with GZ's testimony. Far from being at odds with GZ (as the prosecution contend),... the testimonies can be combined into one narrative.

From "TalkLeft" forum:
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php/to ... #msg101808
Quote:
Dee Dee never said TM was at the mail shelter when he first noticed GZ. She said that's where TM was when he first mentioned seeing GZ to her. Two different things. He passed GZ at the clubhouse to get to the mailbox.

Why do you refer to whether GZ said he saw or didn't see TM at the mailboxes as an admission? It doesn't discredit him either way.

The likely scenario in my view, consistent with both GZ and DeeDee:
According to Dee Dee, Trayvon is at the mailboxes when he first tells her George is watching him in his car and he tells her George is on the phone. So Trayvon has walked from 1460 Retreat View Circle where George first saw him, towards George, who is sitting in his car at the clubhouse on the phone with non-emergency, and passes George (staring at him.) Trayvon reaches the mailboxes (after which George lost sight of him, prompting his statement to the dispatcher, “these as*sholes, they always get away.”) Dee Dee says Trayvon starts walking and they lose phone contact.

Trayvon either walks down the front of TTL or down the shared path. He can see GZ driving down TTL but GZ can't see him. When Trayvon and Dee Dee reconnect, Trayvon tells her the man is still watching him, following him, and he puts up his hoodie because it's raining. She says Trayvon is still walking but getting ready to run. Trayvon is probably behind the houses on Twin Trees Lane now, so that as George parks at Twin Trees Lane, he doesn’t see Trayvon until after he has parked and Trayvon unexpectedly re-appears and circles his truck and then runs off.

Then Dee Dee says she could hear Trayvon running, breathing hard and then Trayvon tells her he lost the man. He’s almost to his father’s house. Trayvon now thinks he has lost George because once he ran from the area, he couldn’t see George, but unbeknownst to him, at this time George is walking along the top of the “T” towards Retreat View Circle, to confirm for the dispatcher which way Trayvon ran and get an address.

Dee Dee says Trayvon then “started walking back.” (She doesn’t say Trayvon “started back walking” which might mean he resumed walking – she says he “started walking back” which implies a direction or place he was returning to.) She tells Trayvon to keep running to his father's house and he says he's not going to run anymore. At this time, Trayvon is probably walking back up the shared path between houses towards the “T.” He tells her he sees George again. At this point, George is probably still walking to Retreat View Circle to get an address and Trayvon can see him from wherever he is on the shared path. Considering the darkness, Trayvon must be pretty close to the “T” again. Dee Dee says a couple of minutes pass. It’s probably during these couple of minutes that George reached Retreat View Circle, stayed for a bit, hung up with non-emergency, put his phone away and began walking back to his car.

Dee Dee says after these couple of minutes, Trayvon tells her George is “getting real close.” Trayvon can probably see very clearly now because he's hiding– probably behind the hedges at 1211 Twin Trees Lane and he sees George, who is on his way back t his car, approaching . I personally think he then ran across to the backyards of 2841/2851 RVC, from where he jumped out at GZ, but that's just my theory.


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:03 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I have read a lot of comments by TM supporters today
(Actually GZ haters is more accurate.. but I digress)

They seem to be convinced that GZ.. went after TM... chased him, caught him and gunned him down.

I honestly am not sure why. There is no evidence of any of that.

It seems they are convinced that "Zimmerman is a liar".. and everything he says is a lie... so ANYTHING at all is automatically correct... just so long as it is anything "NOT WHAT GZ SAID"??

Their fall-back claim is "Zimmerman should have stayed in his truck".

As if by getting out of his truck after TM "skipped off" that everything afterwards was GZ's fault?

None of this makes any sense. Even if you accept that GZ was wrong to get out of his truck (and I don't accept that), then he is still not responsible for TM's attack.

If GZ's intention was to chase after TM... grab him, shoot him, whatever... then he would not be hanging on the phone with LE.... expecting them any second?

If this case gets as far as a trial..... it is the prosecution who will need to come up with a description of events.. and the evidence to prove it.....I don't see it at all.


EDIT: BTW
I have to repeat.. GZ's version is the only version that there is any (much) evidence of. Until it is refuted... it stands as the only description of events. Nit picking "inconsistencies" will not refute it. It is a VERY plausible description... backed up by the scraps of witness testimony... and not to mention the photos of GZ beaten and bloody!

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:22 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Repeating another TalkLeft post

I came across this excellent reply by "TalkLeft" at the TalkLeft forum.

http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php


Replying to a poster who (like many) insists on picking away at minor points and MISSES the larger picture

(Bold words inserted by me)
Quote:
XXXXXX You might see more clearly if you'd look for his (Zimmerman's) narrative of events instead of nitpicking answers to questions that include misinterpretations of what he just tried to explain.

He really doesn't vary from his narrative. Does that make it true? Who knows. But his version is consistent, it's hampered only by questions which misstate his previous answers.

How many times did he tell Singleton the circling was when he was at TTL, and the circling is not the same event as the one when Trayvon first approached his car at the clubhouse? At least 3 by my count.

Who cares whether it's by the clubhouse or at the clubhouse? Maybe he also stopped at the mailboxes. This is the night of the event and the next day and he's trying to recount a traumatic event step by step. That’s difficult for anyone to do.

I make my clients “walk me” through traffic stops and arrests and searches step by step, as close as possible to the event, before their memories fade. They get frustrated, they want to tell the main points and I want baby steps, in sequence. Getting the exact events for a traffic stop can take 3 hours of questioning, and there is no trauma like an assault or death involved. GZ was interviewed for less than two hours, by an officer not familiar with the neighborhood, who hadn’t been to the scene, who kept mixing things up when she repeated what she thought he had said. He started out trying to give her the main points, not knowing to distinguish between point A and point B. When she mixes the two up, he is quick to correct her on all points. He also corrects Serino on the dispatcher not instructing him not to follow Trayvon

He never varies on where Trayvon attacked him, when TM ran, that he cried out for help, that the guy who came out went back in to call 911 instead of helping him . That he was attacked for no reason, out of nowhere. That he kept asking for the police to come. That he never confronted or intended to confront TM, he expected police to do that. That he thought he was responding to the dispatcher’s questions when he got out of the car – to get an address and see which way Trayvon had run.

The jury won’t nitpick this. Why? Because it’s all pretty irrelevant to the charges: Did Trayvon attack him, and when he shot him, did he reasonably believe himself to be in danger of serious bodily injury or death?

No matter where he was, there’s no indication he did anything to provoke Martin’s use of force against him. And even if the jury thinks he did, it still has to acquit him unless it finds he had some other lesser means of extricating himself from danger posed by Trayvon’s fracturing his nose and banging his head into cement.

Witness 6 says TM was on top and GZ was trying to get up and couldn’t. GZ says every time he tried to sit up and get out from under TM, TM would slam his head back down. He has injuries, they don’t have to be life-threatening. What reasonable person wouldn’t fear serious bodily injury if unable to stop the attack? What other means did he have at his disposal – regardless of whether TM saw his gun and was reaching for it?

Keep in mind, GZ’s belief that TM had seen his gun and was reaching for it doesn’t have to be real; it just has to be reasonable and he really had to have believed it.

He had no way out from under TM. If he reasonably feared serious bodily injury or death, whether the aggressor or not at that point, he’s justified in using lethal force.

You are using a microscope to critique points I doubt will make a difference in terms of disproving his defense. Just look though the big lens and see the whole picture. I think it’s right in front of you.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:16 pm
Posts: 1158
A fact is that some witnesses saw a fight. So it seems to dispute that GZ just ran him down and gunned him down. During a fight a person may automatically begin to fear for his/her life especially if they're getting their head banged.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
It all seems obvious to me Packy.
And there are witnesses who saw TM on top... GZ had the injuries.... he has the only description.. which he gave willingly and even PASSED a lie detector test when asked.....

If he "confronted the guy he shot" ------ NO

If he "was in fear for his life when he shot the guy" ----- YES

I can't see where the outspoken HATE of GZ and all associated with him comes from... other than it is the NORM at some sites (in some threads) to engage in hate and vilification..... that is the game they play...


George Zimmerman lie detector video


_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:14 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Slow news day...

Looks like Shellie Zimmerman will not appear at tomorrow's hearing.. and it will be a formality and a Continuance.
The State has published notice that it is on the verge of suspending Shellie Zimmerman's concealed weapons permit.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/201 ... von-martin


Some documents made public tomorrow...
The latest batch of the state's evidence in the second-degree murder case against George Zimmerman will be released on Wednesday, prosecutors said today.

The records are among those given to Zimmerman's defense last month, including 217 photos from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, eight photos taken by a private investigator, Zimmerman's school records from Manassas, Va., eight incident reports, several crime scene drawings made by witnesses and the cell phone records of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who Zimmerman shot Feb. 26 in Sanford.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/loc ... 5925.story

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:20 am 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Debate continues... a couple of posts at CTH caught my eye....

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... ent-199916
Quote:
jello333 says:
September 19, 2012 at 1:42 am

God, what is wrong with you guys?! George thought that Trayvon might be casing houses, either for a break-in right then, or preparing for one later. THAT is what George suspected. WAS that what Trayvon was actually up to? Not as far as we know. But by the same token, we don’t know that he WASN’T up to something like that. Do we? Ok, so George thinks Tryavon might be contemplating a break-in, and so he calls the cops. What exactly is so crazy, so extreme, so malicious about that… especially considering the recent history of the neighborhood? And everything that follows is about George trying to give the dispatcher info about this suspicious person, and Trayvon apparently planning how HE is gonna confront George… NOT the other way around.

Oh, and you know this, but I’ll repeat it anyway: The only reason George shot Trayvon is because he was, at a minimum, committing aggravated battery on George, or possibly even trying to kill him. Are you claiming that is not likely?… or lemme re-word that, are you claiming that is not at least POSSIBLE?



http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... ent-199918
Quote:
jello333 says:
September 19, 2012 at 1:52 am

Hey, guess what? George doesn’t NEED stand-your-ground to prevail in this case. One of the main parts of SYG is that you don’t have to retreat. But as I’m sure you know by now, George was TRYING to escape, but he COULDN’T. So why would he claim he has a SYG defense, when he couldn’t even use the “no need to retreat” clause? George doesn’t need it, he’s got centuries-old, near universally-recognized, traditional SELF-DEFENSE on his side. Surely you’re not gonna bash traditional self-defense now, are you?


http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... ent-199926
Quote:
jello333 says:
September 19, 2012 at 2:17 am

.........I’m not sure I should help them out, but I’m feeling generous tonight. So if any JQ people are still here, I think this is probably what really happened that night:

Trayvon saw how tired and thirsty George was from all the chasing, and so he met him at the “T”, with the intent to offer him a drink of his watermelon juice. But when he went to pull it from his pocket, the bag it was still in snagged on the zipper of his jacket, then suddenly tore loose, causing the can to sorta fly out like from a sling-shot. Got poor George right in the nose! Then, as we’ve described, George staggered around awhile before falling. He hit the back of his head on the sidewalk, and became delusional, thrashing around violently. So Trayvon, realizing George was gonna seriously hurt himself if he didn’t stop, got on top of him trying to prevent further injury. George kept trying to sit up, but not knowing whether he had injured his neck or not, Trayvon correctly tried to convince him to stay down. Sadly, despite all the good Trayvon was trying to do, in George’s confused state he didn’t understand, and finally pulled out his gun, and…. well…

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1091 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group