Great points, both of you! I am still listening. I had to stop and make coffee
while C cut us a piece of cheesecake.
Then I got distracted and lost in Ferguson.
Carmelita wrote:
He can and should, Milo has a moral obligation to name the priest. As to the young boys at parties I don't know what Milo saw if he saw demons committing pedophilia he should be naming names, though I doubt Milo would know those names.
And what you said also, Rumpole.
I still agree with both of your statements, entirely. Imagine that!
I have three opinions.
I think Milo WANTS to relay names. One, several or all ... I don't know. I am guessing that the problem may be he has been advised he could face slander and libel, and the consequences of THAT. This is the only reason I can think of he has not come forward with specific names. What will be in his book???
Secondly, I think he has made a big mistake getting drunk and saying things he needed to retract, say he is sorry or even "didn't mean" ... I don't believe the last. We do usually say first what we mean. I think he is brilliant, witty, has a future -- and will grow from all of this.
Lastly, I do believe Milo was a HUGE part of Trump's victory (as were Diamond & Silk). At the right time, Milo turned around many #LGBT voters, young and old. Milo & others identifying themselves as #LGBT, seen at Trump rallies early on, began the domino effect. There is no doubt in my mind. For that reason alone, I want to always support him.