It is currently Fri May 23, 2025 3:55 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2620 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 ... 131  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:54 pm
Posts: 659
Rumpole wrote:
I agree Chip... I don't know WHY defence don't take their time... call as many witnesses as the think will be any use at all... to hell with Nelson's schedule?

Time for a filibuster. Talk really slow, ask questions 3 or 4 times for clarification, have trouble with the equipment in court, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Puzzler wrote:
Is it just me?
I can't get TCH to open?
Strange, after reading last night: what would you do if one day you tried to open TCH and got a blank?

I'd go to RT. ;)

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:26 am
Posts: 381
liesel wrote:


If Donnelly violated sequestration of witnesses by being in court. There may be some punishment for the defense or the witness, like words/admonition, and/or other things up to striking testimony for egregious violations.

We can't just quote tweets here without some tinkering because then your comment gets swallowed up in the quote. A better way is just to refer to the tweets, paraphrase the tweets, or just delete the info about the person who posted them so the tweets stand on their own. Like [quote="liesel" and then the end /quote that will actually be in brackets [ like this] but I can't type it that way cos then it will not show up as text, but as a quote. :)


Thanks for the helpful advice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Puzzler wrote:
Is it just me?
I can't get TCH to open?
Strange, after reading last night: what would you do if one day you tried to open TCH and got a blank?

Rumpole wrote:


It's just you..... I have the place open. :(


:doh Should have given you a link to downforeveryone. Ooops. Well, you have it now. :)

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
chipbennett wrote:
Mr. Donnelley, you're not clairvoyant? You didn't know on June 25th that you would be subpoenaed on July 4th?

CONTEMPT OF COURT!

:Gslap

It would be a defense violation if they had him on their witness list but didn't advise him of the sequestration. Clearly, they had no intention to call him because he had nothing to offer until he listened to the 911 call. Even so, it has to go on the record, as you know. Mostly posting for others and using your post to make a point. :)

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:16 am
Posts: 710
I wonder why Diana Tennis thinks witness is a mistake. Anyone have an idea?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:16 am
Posts: 710
I hope he doesn't say he used George's background to formulate his opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
flgirl543 wrote:
I wonder why Diana Tennis thinks witness is a mistake. Anyone have an idea?


In order to not look biased in this case they have to be critical of some defense witnesses.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Hey - I am with everyone else that I'd like the defense to put on a ton of evidence to make sure there is no question left unanswered, to literally prove GZ's innocence. OTOH, wasting the judge's time is also wasting the jury's time, and too much info may drown out the important facts. Just sayin'...

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
flgirl543 wrote:
I wonder why Diana Tennis thinks witness is a mistake. Anyone have an idea?

Overload and also giving the state the opportunity to cross (leading questions) the same info that damaged them in their case.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:14 am 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57119
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
MOM asking about the hysterical witness who "heard" 3 shots... Guy objects

DRINK :63

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:15 am 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57119
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
10:14 a.m.
O’Mara asks if he saw the diagram of the scene.

Root says has seen the TV interview since being asked by the state about it.

He says he focused on background training experience, knowledge of the law and his own background.

He says he listened to every audio recording of the 911 calls and the witnesses.

Root says he has a theory called the “hot pot” theory explaining perspective. He says he could stick a pot in the freezer and then put in on a stove and ask someone to move it and they would still think it is hot.

“Conflicting statements are normal,” Root says.

He says statements with a slight deviation should be taken into context of when they were taken.

O’Mara asks if Root read Surdyka’s statement.

Guy objects as to the improper comment of a witness’s testimony.

O’Mara says he has a response. Judge Nelson asks them to approach.

9:58 a.m.
Root says he reached out to O’Mara when he saw the case unfolding in the media.

He says he thought he could offer his perspective and reached out to the defense. He reached out to O’Mara because he reviewed the material and if he couldn’t be of assistance, he wouldn’t hinder anything.

He says as a use of force expert he has to look at the situation from as many perspectives as possible.

Root says he requested to review the 911 calls, reports from law enforcement, medical examiner’s office and more.

He says he had written witness statements and interviews conducted.

He believes he received everything, including Martin's autopsy and pictures of him and Zimmerman.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:26 am
Posts: 381
liesel wrote:
Hey - I am with everyone else that I'd like the defense to put on a ton of evidence to make sure there is no question left unanswered, to literally prove GZ's innocence. OTOH, wasting the judge's time is also wasting the jury's time, and too much info may drown out the important facts. Just sayin'...


You don't want to have the jury get unhappy with you either as it may effect their decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
SheStone wrote:

You don't want to have the jury get unhappy with you either as it may effect their decision.

Yes, exactly, and could result in some change in the momentum of the case; seizing defeat from the jaws of victory by giving the state too much opportunity.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:16 am
Posts: 710
I hope this is getting through to the jury. Use common sense, coupled with known information (not imaginary information).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2620 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 ... 131  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group