Sundance has CREATED a fantasy world....A world of Black hats, white hats, multidimensional "chess moves"... new facts are manipulated to slot into that world.
Like many well known FICTIONAL worlds (in literature)... it makes for a "jolly good read", and a "fan base" of readers who "can't wait" to read the next chapter. All sorts of things are possible in a world you create yourself (ref Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit, Harry Potter). Things may well make "perfect sense" within the context of the created realm.... but.... it has only passing relevance to THE REAL WORLD. It may well be that in many instances a simple event in the real world may need to be described as a "3-D Chess move" to fit into the fantasy world.
Let me get this straight... in The Sundance world it is OK for DoJ/FBI (Wray, Rosenstein and Sessions) to REFUSE to provide documents to Congressional Oversight scrutiny... because... "reasons"
Sounds CONTRARY TO THE CONSTITUTION to me. I am sure there is not a caveat that says Congress does not have the OBLIGATION to provide oversight if the DoJ/FBI can come up with a reason why not?
In this case the valid "reason" that Sundance proposes is....because requested documents are evidence in an ongoing investigation... not a completed investigation with Indictments and court proceedings in progress.. just "an investigation" with nobody indicted yet, nor even the crimes involved defined? In fact who knows if there really IS an investigation? It may even be that the "investigation" ends with no crime or criminal identified. It seems to me the most we have is a long winded OIG internal fact finding exercise.. with a "review" and a report and recommendations pending... one day.. maybe still months from now
Even if we concede that there is a REAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.. Sundance's imagined ongoing Huber Criminal Investigation, with Grand Jury in place for months....with crimes and criminals KNOWN for sure... I don't see how that can be a legitimate "reason" to withhold documents requested by Congress Oversight. It is not actually a "request" ... it is NOT OPTIONAL. Congress have a right to see documents. Naturally, there are considerations in regards security clearance of those who gain access.... but that is covered by the issuing of such security clearance to the appropriate Congress persons. The fact that people like Schiff CAN NOT BE TRUSTED... is NOT reason to withhold information from Congress generally.... it should be reason to revoke Schiff's security clearance.... and to have him removed from Committees with access to Classified documents (and thrown in prison)... that is an issue for Congress (Paul Ryan).... but NOT a reason to withhold the documents from CONGRESS as a body.
The evidence is real, the Indictments are Fake....
Login
FAQ
Do not go gentle into that good night.
