r u serious?

Would I lie to you?

Oh, wait... this isn't the Answer My Question With A Question thread.

Yes, jordan2, I've heard on local radio in Florida, and have seen tweets about it that link to a facebook page. Here's one:

Read more at WESH.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

"WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer is be Greg's guest. They discuss the Zimmermans, the Bessman Okafor trial and the Casey Anthony deposition."

Video here.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Yes, mbtb, I expect that will be the outcome. AGAIN!

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Some posts were moved to new Crump is at it again thread.

Reminder: If your post is missing, be sure to check the View your posts link at the top right of each page to track it down.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

After having read what the dipstick wrote in that email response, it was hard to determine how Bracknell became the Chief. I wonder if he's smart enough to regret sending it?

Well... he sure got a big pat on the head from the sender of the email, and likely other Trayborg™ as well. Unless and until someone organizes at least a #hashtag demanding the recusal of such an openly biased investigative agency, he has no reason to recuse himself. Most of the media bought into the narrative so they're not going to call him out, kwim?

RZjr and the DC tried to call him out. As far as I know, there is no movement to get him fired, or demanding his resignation. I think it's imminently reasonable that Bracknell's agency not be in charge of investigating anyone they've voiced such prejudice toward. But until some sort of pressure is brought to bear, nothing will happen.

If Bracknell were ethical, and/or if he were capable of putting his personal feelings aside when doing his job, there wouldn't be a controversy.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Read more at Fox News.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

I understand she's hurt and angry. She has good cause for both. But this is just wrong with a capital WRONG. If it's true, of course. Always that caveat with the media, especially in this case.


Read more (after taking anti-nausea meds) at WESH.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Chip, you do know that after agreeing to allow SZ to have access to the house, GZ decided to go there to video tape her, to make sure she wasn't taking anything that wasn't agreed upon, right? Or were you thinking of something else in blaming her for the incident?

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Sorry, but I can't read how SZ is talking out of her posterior to any presstitute who will give her a microphone, and then trust anything she has to say about what happened that day.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

That's in the police report, attributed to GZ.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Okay?

There's still a long way from that, to an actual, physical altercation. And to bridge that gap, we only have he-said, she-said.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)