John_Galt wrote:
Maddy appears to have a problem with logical thought.
"The only minority on the all-female jury that voted to acquit George Zimmerman said today that Zimmerman "got away with murder" for killing Trayvon Martin and feels she owes an apology Martin's parents."
"She said the jury was following Florida law and the evidence, she said, did not prove murder."
""I was the juror that was going to give them the hung jury. I fought to the end," she said.
However, on the second day of deliberations, after spending nine hours discussing the evidence, Maddy said she realized there wasn't enough proof to convict Zimmerman of murder or manslaughter under Florida law."
"When asked by Roberts whether the case should have gone to trial, Maddy said, "I don't think so."
"I felt like this was a publicity stunt. This whole court service thing to me was publicity," she said."
(Emphasis added)
Excellent analysis, JG. Thank you for putting it in perspective.
This is yet another "victim" that has been so thoroughly brainwashed that she really doesn't understand the conflict in what she said. Unfortunately, neither will the other "victims" and the headlines will only read "He got away with murder" so as to further the dying narrative.
When the other jurors were apparently patient enough to take her step-by-step through the evidence and law, Maddy was clearly intelligent enough to understand the only true verdict that could be rendered. Once released from service, her early "victim" imprinting once again took over her thought process.
_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.
