It is currently Mon May 19, 2025 4:32 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
Thank you, Chip's spokesman.

(I knew Chip was popular, gets quoted at other places and such... but he has a spokesman now? Next thing you know, he'll have an ego as big as Rumpole's!)

JOKING - :86

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:19 pm
Posts: 366
Would/could the defense ask questions of Crump in front of the jury wrt "why" was Crump/Sybrina present during BDLR's interview with DD...or "why" was the interview held in Sybrina's home?

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
There's no way anyone here could definitively answer that, Puzzler, sorry. It will depend a lot upon what Nelson allowed in the deposition and then what she'll allow in court, based on the rules, predicate/foundation, etc. But I'd sure like to know the answer... I suspect one of these days #8 or someone else who knows a lot will write a book to cash in. Maybe Traybro™ or a Traycousin™.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
I posted this on the Dailey Daft thread, meant to post it here...

Ryan Smith making a big deal about Serino admitting to Bernie today that he *saw no blood on GZ's hands.* Bernie was so proud of himself strutting away. Idiot...by the time Serino saw GZ is was midnight....jerk!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:19 pm
Posts: 366
It was brought in through Rachel's testimony that Crump/Sybrina/BDLR and Asst. were there with her...if MOM calls Rachel back to the stand during the defense's case, I would not be surprised to hear her questioned about it again.

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:19 pm
Posts: 366
Trayvon Martin's Cell Phone Records

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/7/1/ ... ne-Records

(snip) First up: Brandy Greene’s 14 year old son Chad Joseph, (now 15.) Chad talked to Martin at 7:04 pm and was told it was raining and he was on his way home. Chad told investigators on 4/27/12 that he didn’t hear any commotion or shooting because his bedroom was in the front of the house and he was playing games with his headset on. (Page 39 of the 284 page Second Supplemental Discovery.) But look at the phone records: Chad called Martin's phone 9 times beginning 5 minutes after the shooting. Each call went to voice-mail. (snip)

_________________
Puzzler - that which puzzles or perplexes; anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable or secret.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:34 am
Posts: 892
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
liesel wrote:
Thank you, Chip's spokesman.

(I knew Chip was popular, gets quoted at other places and such... but he has a spokesman now? Next thing you know, he'll have an ego as big as Rumpole's!)

JOKING - :86


I'm married; no worries about inflated ego.

And Rumpole's right of course: more sans-audio sidebar at the bench, followed by a prompt recess until 8:30 tomorrow.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Arizona
Isn't the side bar reference the unknown fingerprint on the slide of the gun? I thought I heard that. Did they check it against the first officer on the scene who took the gun from GZ?

Someone would have had to make that gun safe as soon as possible, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 612
Location: Rosenberg, Texas
murderbythebook wrote:
Isn't the side bar reference the unknown fingerprint on the slide of the gun? I thought I heard that. Did they check it against the first officer on the scene who took the gun from GZ?

Someone would have had to make that gun safe as soon as possible, no?


Officer Smith, removed the magazine, pulled the slide back, and locked the slide.

http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/ba ... ments.html

Quote:
Smith says he wasn’t wearing gloves when he took Zimmerman’s gun and didn’t handle it a certain way because there wasn’t enough time.

He says he removed the magazine and locked the slide back. He says a round was ejected and collected, and then secured in his patrol vehicle until he could get a gun box.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Arizona
Thanks LondoJowo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
A Traybot link.

http://www.businessinsider.com/cop-wore ... n=31858922


Last edited by taurus on Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:16 am
Posts: 710
Today we learned George showed a depraved mind by saying a holes & f'ing punks. His main inconsistencies or deceptions were whether he was looking for an address and/or following (both of which he admitted to) and Trayvon's hands were under his body after George claimed he pulled them apart. (Another fact easily explained). He showed no remorse in Hannity interview and thought the event was God's plan. And most importantly, his injuries were insignificant. Before this bought and paid for ME testified, most relatively reasonable people acknowledged George took a beating.

Tomorrow we'll learn if the state can use his extensive knowledge of criminal justice and SYG, to further prove the state's theory of the case. I hope the state points out, while they believe this extensive knowledge enabled George to kill Trayvon without cause and frame his claim of self defense, he neglected to use this knowledge to exaggerate his injuries at the scene and immediately request medical treatment and transport to the hospital. And once again, failed to use this extensive knowledge to request the advice of counsel before giving any statements.

Why don't any of the talking heads see the lunacy of this "theory". I hope the jury can use common sense and reasoning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 3:52 pm
Posts: 45
Also,, love the silly pic of the address on the building. But gee, that pic was, uh TAKEN DURING THE DAY TIME. How about they show a pic from that point on a dark rainy night? can the state prove that person's porch light was on as well? Also, the path is perceived as a back walk, it is VERY REASONABLE that GZ did not know there were actual house numbers on the outer walls. Did George own a dog? How many times had he actually walked that path on foot since he had lived there? And if he did, did he care to look and see if there were house numbers there in what he perceived as a back path? I mean, come on, MOM should be able to destroy that stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:50 pm 
Online
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
chipbennett wrote:
I'm married; no worries about inflated ego.

And Rumpole's right of course: more sans-audio sidebar at the bench, followed by a prompt recess until 8:30 tomorrow.


Me too Chip :)

The Character "Rumpole of the Bailey" refers to his wife Hilda (affectionately) as:

"She who must be obeyed" Image

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 575
flgirl543 wrote:
Today we learned George showed a depraved mind by saying a holes & f'ing punks. His main inconsistencies or deceptions were whether he was looking for an address and/or following (both of which he admitted to) and Trayvon's hands were under his body after George claimed he pulled them apart. (Another fact easily explained). He showed no remorse in Hannity interview and thought the event was God's plan. And most importantly, his injuries were insignificant. Before this bought and paid for ME testified, most relatively reasonable people acknowledged George took a beating.

Tomorrow we'll learn if the state can use his extensive knowledge of criminal justice and SYG, to further prove the state's theory of the case. I hope the state points out, while they believe this extensive knowledge enabled George to kill Trayvon without cause and frame his claim of self defense, he neglected to use this knowledge to exaggerate his injuries at the scene and immediately request medical treatment and transport to the hospital. And once again, failed to use this extensive knowledge to request the advice of counsel before giving any statements.

Why don't any of the talking heads see the lunacy of this "theory". I hope the jury can use common sense and reasoning.

I am optimistic that this jury will use common sense and reasoning. Listening to their comments during jury selection, they seemed to be mature and intelligent women. I know that many believe, because they are females and mothers, they will be more sympathetic for a mother's loss and will be heavily swayed to convict George. But being a woman and mother close to the ages of the mature women on the jury, I remind everyone that there are 2 mothers experiencing terrible losses of their sons in this case. I, myself, have much more sympathy for the mother whose "wanna-be cop" son is losing his life and freedom than the mother whose loss is the "wanna-be thug" who was forced to raise himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
Judge Strikes Serino's Testimony

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/0 ... d%3D339491


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 617
More Complaints About ME Rao

http://www.news4jax.com/news/more-compl ... index.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
RichardHornsby wrote:
Don’t Believe Every Tweet You Read
Because of some erroneous Tweeting going on in the Twitterverse, I keep receiving the following two recurring questions regarding George Zimmerman’s case:
    1.Is Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child an available lesser offense; and
    2.Does the 10-20-Life firearms enhancement still apply to a Manslaughter charge.

The answer to both of these questions is nope.

...


Read more, including mentioning NatJack, here.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
taurus wrote:

Thanks, Taurus. After what I saw today, I'm not surprised. From the linked article:

    "In the minutes officers expressed disapproval of Dr. Rao's "propensity to classify virtually all prison deaths as homicides, and lack of expertise by office personnel in the management of crime scene investigations."

Oh yeah, it's whatever it takes for the $$.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
"contrary to what Attorney Natalie Jackson"

NatJack made a legal error? Shocking.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group