It is currently Sun May 18, 2025 5:45 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:22 pm
Posts: 103
I have to believe that the prosecutors actually knew everything the defense said about their "experts" was true.

I fully believe the prosecutors know they're trying to put an innocent man away in prison.

That's pretty twisted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:26 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Jury to decide whose voice on 911 call in Zimmerman case
Posted on Saturday, 06.22.13
By DAVID OVALLE and AUDRA D.S. BURCH


Jurors will listen to a recording of the chilling 911 call that captured the distant, fearful cries in the vicious outdoor fight between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin.

But the jury in the closely-watched case won’t hear from two prosecution audio experts who suggested that the voice screaming out in fear belongs to Trayvon, a Seminole County judge ruled Saturday in a decision some legal observers called a significant blow to the prosecution two days before the trial opens.

Testimony from the experts, Tom Owen and Alan Reich, both of whom analyzed a 911 call made by a neighbor, could have been important evidence for state prosecutors because it would have helped portray Zimmerman as the aggressor.

...more at link
http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/06/22/3 ... perts.html

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:22 pm
Posts: 103
I may dislike Ed Primeau but in putting this video together, he proved once and for all what I'd known for a year+ - it is George screaming.

The defense should play this video or their own recreation of it:



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:31 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Geosurface wrote:
I have to believe that the prosecutors actually knew everything the defense said about their "experts" was true.

I fully believe the prosecutors know they're trying to put an innocent man away in prison.

That's pretty twisted.


They also KNOW they are pandering to BGI and it's extortion operatives in the Scheme team. They are in fact using Crump et al to promote their case in the media... propaganda.. aimed at inflaming passions in the public. Promoting racial disharmony.

It amounts to Sedition? Insurrection? Treason? Something not nice :)

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:01 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
Just think... George could be FREE this time next week... State presents what it has.. MOM motions for dismissal.

The NEW IMPROVED (with enzymes) Judge Nelson Grants the Motion.

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 4269
With Owen and Reich out, that leaves the state with Sybrina, Tracy who originally said it wasn't TM™, and TM™'s brother who said he wasn't sure, among other less close relatives and/or friends. And who knows how many others initially expressed uncertainty about the voice in the recording.

On the other hand, GZ's father and brother were certain it was GZ and we can expect his mom and sis were likewise certain. On top of that, at least two neighbors indicated they recognized the screams as being the voice of GZ. Pretty powerful stuff.

I have to add, again, how pleased I am that Owen will not likely be providing false testimony in the future. Not only was he excluded in this case, but the reasons he was excluded are damning to any hope of resurrecting an expert qualification in future cases, imo.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:52 am
Posts: 48
Geosurface wrote:
I may dislike Ed Primeau but in putting this video together, he proved once and for all what I'd known for a year+ - it is George screaming.

The defense should play this video or their own recreation of it:



The defense just spent 5 days in court and thousands of dollars to keep so called experts like these out. Primeau says nothing in that video that says it's George but even if he had he'd still be wrong. The science just doesn't exist to say what screams belong to who.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:22 pm
Posts: 103
DiwataMan wrote:
The defense just spent 5 days in court and thousands of dollars to keep so called experts like these out. Primeau says nothing in that video that says it's George but even if he had he'd still be wrong. The science just doesn't exist to say what screams belong to who.


The fact that Primeau made that video isn't even relevant to the point I'm making. Wouldn't matter if the resurrected foot of Saddam Hussein had made the video, it contains an assembly of publicly available audio that anyone could've made, from the exemplar and the screams in the 911 call. It's pretty clear that its' George screaming when those are listened to side by side.

I agree with what the defense did in the Frye hearing, playing audio *like* this (not this same one but make something very similar themselves) would go a long way toward proving to the juror's satisfaction that it was George.

That's an entirely different animal than what Owen and Reich were doing. Owen was claiming his computer program spat out a number that proved it wasn't GZ, and Reich was engaging in EVP Ghost Hunter senility nonsense.

This is entirely something else. Taking existing, accepted pieces of evidence (the exemplars and the 911 screams) and playing them together for comparison sake. Nothing voodoo about it, nothing questionable about it. Don't kneejerk react to Primeau's name :) I hate him too. The only reason I even linked anything from him is that he happened to be the person who combined the audiofiles. I could do it again myself and the point would still stand.

You're right to say "the science doesn't exist" and I agree. What I agree though, is that there is no surefire method or computer program which can say with certainty whose screams they are. That's not what I'm talking about at all here. I'm talking about letting the jury hear the audio in a more effective format: mixed together. I don't know if the rules of court would allow that... but if not, they could surely play the exemplar and the 911 screams back to back, which might help make the point too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:47 pm
Posts: 253
Natalie jackson's Mom Francis Oliver turned up in the comments section on the Slantinels article about the Frye ruling spewing her usual anti white race crap http://imgur.com/XkBCxj9


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
Rumpole wrote:
Lets spare a thought for the weasel in this case...

Nelson's ruling is also a Bitch slap for the Weasel



Nelson saved him from great embarrassment and anguish. He would have had to be treated for PTSD after watching West destroy Owen and Reich at trial.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
kingkazpur wrote:
Natalie jackson's Mom Francis Oliver turned up in the comments section on the Slantinels article about the Frye ruling spewing her usual anti white race crap http://imgur.com/XkBCxj9


Nice catch. Race card is in play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:29 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
kingkazpur wrote:
Natalie jackson's Mom Francis Oliver turned up in the comments section on the Slantinels article about the Frye ruling spewing her usual anti white race crap http://imgur.com/XkBCxj9

How can we verify it is from her?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:52 am
Posts: 48
DiwataMan wrote:
The defense just spent 5 days in court and thousands of dollars to keep so called experts like these out. Primeau says nothing in that video that says it's George but even if he had he'd still be wrong. The science just doesn't exist to say what screams belong to who.


Geosurface wrote:

The fact that Primeau made that video isn't even relevant to the point I'm making. Wouldn't matter if the resurrected foot of Saddam Hussein had made the video, it contains an assembly of publicly available audio that anyone could've made, from the exemplar and the screams in the 911 call. It's pretty clear that its' George screaming when those are listened to side by side.

I agree with what the defense did in the Frye hearing, playing audio *like* this (not this same one but make something very similar themselves) would go a long way toward proving to the juror's satisfaction that it was George.

That's an entirely different animal than what Owen and Reich were doing. Owen was claiming his computer program spat out a number that proved it wasn't GZ, and Reich was engaging in EVP Ghost Hunter senility nonsense.

This is entirely something else. Taking existing, accepted pieces of evidence (the exemplars and the 911 screams) and playing them together for comparison sake. Nothing voodoo about it, nothing questionable about it. Don't kneejerk react to Primeau's name :) I hate him too. The only reason I even linked anything from him is that he happened to be the person who combined the audiofiles. I could do it again myself and the point would still stand.

You're right to say "the science doesn't exist" and I agree. What I agree though, is that there is no surefire method or computer program which can say with certainty whose screams they are. That's not what I'm talking about at all here. I'm talking about letting the jury hear the audio in a more effective format: mixed together. I don't know if the rules of court would allow that... but if not, they could surely play the exemplar and the 911 screams back to back, which might help make the point too.



That's funny Geosurface because the other side says the opposite, play the exemplars for the jury and they will be able to easily tell it's not George.

I wonder if the defense or State will even use the exemplars or if there would be any challenges to such use. I would have to ask the lawerly types for that stuff though.

(Like that Rumpole?)

edit Rumpole
:85


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
kbp wrote:
How can we verify it is from her?


NatJack should be responding to VP, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:16 pm 
Offline
ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:30 pm
Posts: 57118
Location: Pomeroy's Wine Bar
I can't recall if Nasty usually (ever) responds to V.P.?

_________________
Image Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
Nothing at Nasty's page since VP's tweet went out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585


Last edited by John_Galt on Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 1056
I missed that completely! No denial there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 585
:slap Owen finished early.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group