DiwataMan wrote:
The defense just spent 5 days in court and thousands of dollars to keep so called experts like these out. Primeau says nothing in that video that says it's George but even if he had he'd still be wrong. The science just doesn't exist to say what screams belong to who.
The fact that Primeau made that video isn't even relevant to the point I'm making. Wouldn't matter if the resurrected foot of Saddam Hussein had made the video, it contains an assembly of publicly available audio that anyone could've made, from the exemplar and the screams in the 911 call. It's pretty clear that its' George screaming when those are listened to side by side.
I agree with what the defense did in the Frye hearing, playing audio *like* this (not this same one but make something very similar themselves) would go a long way toward proving to the juror's satisfaction that it was George.
That's an entirely different animal than what Owen and Reich were doing. Owen was claiming his computer program spat out a number that proved it wasn't GZ, and Reich was engaging in EVP Ghost Hunter senility nonsense.
This is entirely something else. Taking existing, accepted pieces of evidence (the exemplars and the 911 screams) and playing them together for comparison sake. Nothing voodoo about it, nothing questionable about it. Don't kneejerk react to Primeau's name

I hate him too. The only reason I even linked anything from him is that he happened to be the person who combined the audiofiles. I could do it again myself and the point would still stand.
You're right to say "the science doesn't exist" and I agree. What I agree though, is that there is no surefire method or computer program which can say with certainty whose screams they are. That's not what I'm talking about at all here. I'm talking about letting the jury hear the audio in a more effective format: mixed together. I don't know if the rules of court would allow that... but if not, they could surely play the exemplar and the 911 screams back to back, which might help make the point too.