I think Rene Stutzman is captivated by him. I am sure the jury is paying attention to his dramatics.

More questions & questions about how Trayvon injured George? WTH does this do? dipsticks

I had to turn the sound off, I cannot even listen to this nonsense. Just like MOM warned them, he is coming out with the emotional garbage because they simply have no case based on evidence.

She's still getting over seeing the morgue hpoto!

That is silly I imagine TM did see the gun when he got shot. Didn't they also originally try to claim GZ already had the gun out? How can he now make that claim?

Yes - This ^^^

Sounds right to me.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

I wish we had some tweets as to how the jurors were reacting to MOM and now to Guy.

...stay in car...


I bet Crump is FINALLY happy!

Strangely, I don't remember the State putting on any actual evidence to prove that:

1) It is physically impossible to reach a concealed handgun with someone mounting you, at any position
2) Martin could not have seen Zimmerman's IWB-holstered handgun
3) It is physically impossible for Martin to have run off, then come back to circle Zimmerman's vehicle, then run off again

And the real zinger:

Guy: "This case isn't about Stand Your Ground. It's about not getting out of your car."

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

Thanks.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

12:32 p.m.
“If he hadn’t committed a crime, why did he lie so many times,” Guy says.

Guy says Zimmerman lied in saying Noffke told him to get an address.

He says Zimmerman lied when he said he told police to meet him at his car.

Zimmerman lied about being confronted, Guy says.

He lied about Martin covering his mouth and nose, he says.

He asks if there would be blood on the sticks used on Martin’s fingernails.

Guy points out the concrete.

He says if Zimmerman was bashed over and over he wouldn’t look like he did in the photos.

Guy says he lied about being punched dozens of times.

He says Martin had a right to defend himself too.

He says Zimmerman didn’t complain of a headache and sought treatment for a note for work.

Zimmerman lied about Martin seeing the gun, Guy says.

He asks if Martin saw the gun if there would be a gunshot at 90 degrees in his chest.

Zimmerman lied about spreading Martin’s hands out, Guy says.

He says Martin’s hands were clutching the bullet wound in his chest.

Zimmerman lied about Martin circling his car to make him sound menacing, Guy says.

He says Zimmerman lied about knowing the Stand Your Ground law.

Guy says the case isn’t about stand your ground, but staying in the car.

12:25 p.m.
He asks them to use their common sense that it was the person talking like the defendant that had hate in his heart.

Guy tells them they can use the mannequin in the jury room.

He says it’s a physical impossibility for Zimmerman to get his gun. He says the only way is that Martin was getting off of him or he had backed up so far he couldn’t hit him.

Guy says Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to.

He asks why Zimmerman went to get an address when Martin had already run off. He says it was self-serving justification and false.

Guy asks them to listen to Jenna Lauer’s 911 call and listen to when the screaming stops at the instance of the gunshot.

He asks why Zimmerman would stop yelling for help if he was in fear.

He asks if Zimmerman’s voice would’ve been hoarse. HE says it is a common sense case.

“It’s not a case about self-defense, it’s a case of self-denial,” Guy says.

He says common sense tells them Zimmerman would know the name of the street.

Guy says if the defendant was soft, he wouldn’t have been able to get wrist control of Martin.

Guy asks if Martin was still on the hunt, would he have stayed on the phone.

12:19 p.m.
He says if the defendant had only done what he was supposed to, to see and call, none of them would be there.

Zimmerman got out of the car, Guy says, but would’ve stayed in his car and driven to the back gate to wait for the police.

He says Martin may not have the defendant’s blood on his hands, but Zimmerman will forever have Martin’s blood on his hands.

Guy quotes “To the living we owe respect, to the dead we owe the truth.”

He says Martin is entitled to the truth and it didn’t come from Zimmerman.

“What evidence is there the defendant followed Martin after he said OK?”

Guy asks what happened after Zimmerman hung up with Noffke and before Martin’s call with Jeantel disconnected.

He asks the jurors to watch the walk-through again.

He says there was two minutes where Zimmerman didn’t go back to his car.

Guy says four minutes is not the amount of time Martin had to run home, but it was how long he had left on his life.

He says he’s asking them to use their common sense and heart and what they heard and the law in the case.

Guy says the animation starts at the “T” intersection and it’s not fair. He suggests they start at the beginning at the 7-Eleven where Martin had every right to be where he was and do what he was doing in walking home.

He asks if the child had the right to defend himself from a strange man.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

MOM looks disgusted, imo. And if so, I agree with him.

_________________
All posts are my own opinion and do not necessarily reflect the views of Random Topics. Differences are allowed here.

Once again that since GZ didn't give aid to TM he is guilty.

Oh, did they charge George with Getting Out of Your Car? I really thought the charge was 2nd degree Murder.

He obviously doesn't watch CSI. They do sometimes have iffy witnesses.

This really does sound like he has been reading at Justarse Quest.

Including the fact that he misses the point about actually PROVING a theory as opposed to raising possibilities (Reasonable doubt)

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

So which side would be happier if the jury comes back with a verdict fast, say 30 minutes or an hour?"

Who "produced" this trial? What a term to use. Also it should be noted it was the State that "produced" the trial as to place and time, not GZ.