Oh joy. Recess. More Bill Schaeffer - this time, helpfully explaining that, in charging Zimmerman with second-degree murder, the State is attempting to prove the case that Zimmerman following Martin constitutes a "deliberate act" that led to Martin's death, and that Zimmerman's a-holes and f-king punks comments evince a depraved mind.

Except that, Zimmerman "following" is not a deliberate act that caused Martin's death. Essentially: the State appears to be attempting to prove involuntary manslaughter for a second-degree murder charge.

...
My understanding of the testimony is that it was a piece of awning that could have been used as a burglarly tool like a slim-jim. Yes, agree with your points.

Let's count the number of timed Zimmerman has recounted what happened:

1) On-scene comments
2) First interview with Singleton
3) First interview with Serino
4) On-site walkthrough
5) Second (challenge) interview with Serino/Singleton
6) Recounting to Osterman
7) Hannity interview

Not a single, material inconsistency in any of these statements.

Isn't the State supposed to prove something?

Here is the ice cream motion for anyone who missed it:

I'm lost...no one updated me about this am, and I am being ignored.

LOLll You take no prisoners Rump, a hard taskmaster to us poor working girls