http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/loc ... 5785.story
Just got this sent to my phone

Yeah, we discussed this yesterday (in this thread, IIRC). Apparently, Blackwell's reading comprehension skills need some improvement. He's grossly mis-interpreting Rule 3.220 with respect to witnesses listed/unlisted by the State, and the Defense's rights with respect to deposing such witnesses without leave of court.

_________________
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 5th DCA, Stinson v. State (Fl)

That's what I thought chip & wondered why OS calls this breaking news today?

You're right! It should be easy to push BDLR's buttons. He seems quite emotionally unstable and this could hopefully be off-putting to a jury.

If MOM/West play their questioning of the prosecution witnesses correctly they may get BDLR so upset he blows the redirect.

John, I understand what you are saying, but you are making it sound easy. The prosecution it seems to me will try to do what defense attorneys usually which is discredit GZ story.

For instance, he'll put Serino on the stand with the video, but didn't GZ said this and that. Then he will put someone else and repeat. Until GZ's version is made unbelievable. True enough that MOM and West will try the opposite, but if yesterday was any indication, things are looking difficult for GZ.

BDLR's style is abrupt, but can be effective with the right jury.

Finally, I am even more disappointed in Florida's justice system, and it is obvious now, that BDLR and the State is it determined to win at any cost. The obvious lies to any who had followed the case, and glossing over contrary evidence made it clear the State intends to win, justice and truth be damned.

So Nelson, contrary to the evidence code, will allow BDLR to have Serino and others testify about their recollection of the contents of GZ's recorded statements, rather than just playing the available recordings? Yeah, could happen I guess.

Reiterating a previous comment... Traybots really do not "get it"

Faced with evidence that they HAVE been fed a false narrative about Trayvon being an innocent child... rather than CHANGE their evaluation of TM and the case... their main concern is that this EVIDENCE should be BLOCKED.

They are too stupid to see that they are NOT questing for justice at all... not seeking the truth... they are happy to see the truth blocked... all they want is a result.. a conviction based on preconceived (WRONG) notions.

They ARE a LYNCH MOB for sure.

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

I think they know exactly what they are doing. Too evil, not too stupid.

I agree, John some are evil.

But some are just plain stupid... they don't comprehend information presented to them.. and lack basic ability with logic.. "If A... then B"

Throughout history... mobs have been comprised of mostly stupid people.. susceptible to manipulation by truly evil people.

Mass hysteria... and a group mentality drives them.... The Scheme Team at the fore in this case overall... but at a forum level you have the "Alpha Cretins" I have referred to leading the mass of "worker cretins"

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

Indeed.

_________________
Getting facts right is a fundamental requirement of morality.
- P. J. O'Rourke

When you have idiots that actually believe the following it really makes you wonder if they actually have an IQ greater that 30.

Posted by Nettles on Diwataman site:

http://www.flcourts18.org/PDF/Press_Rel ... idence.pdf

Order to inspect and photograph evidence...

What is the tat peeking out of the top of the Tee, in the middle of his chest? A Ms.Candy Rose?

I wonder what that is?

_________________
Do not go gentle into that good night.
___________ Rage, rage against the dying of the light

From CTH - Sundance wrote:



Sounds like the jewelry will get it's photo op.

If you listen, i think it is at the end of hearing, when BDLR and West were talking, I THINK its BDLR who says something to the effect of We will get it faxed down to Miami.... so I am assuming ths is what they were talking about.

- I goofed on the previous, still having problems with this format --

this is all I wanted to say -

Allowing BDLR free reign in questioning West allowed MOM/West to get their story out. I think it backfired on BDLR.

Except for strategy, there was nothing for MOM/West to hide. BDLR's persistent questioning gave West the opportunity to give carefully worded replies which revealed the mendacity of BDLR and allowed the defense to get more of the story out in front of the media.



edit Rumpole
If quoting a post that already contains a quote
you need to delete the nested quote
The final code is always


That code will give

Thanks John!



"Any Self-Defense Immunity ...shall be filed ...on or before April 26, 2013..."

What's your thoughts on Chip's comment that Nelson will rule any future motion on immunity to be "untimely"?

That is what I cannot understand.