There has been a bit of troll activity at CTH.
The usual... pretend being calm and asking "serious" questions.. but really inane repetitive nit-picking on irrelevant details, rather than the overwhelming overall. Such people don't seem to grasp the answer even when people take the time to answer them. The troll poster seems to use several names at CTH and is almost certainly an
undercover cretin from JQ One CTH poster took the time to reply at length.. it is worth repeating..
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... ent-244086In answer to repeated posts by
sunnieday7.......
Chip Bennett says: November 16, 2012 at 8:54 pm
I
asked a question that I did not receive appropriate answers to, just excuses.
You were given several credible answers to your asinine question; that you chose not to accept them is your problem, not ours.
I don’t care if screams are not admissible in court, it speaks to George’s credibility in other matters that will be admissible in court, such as his NEN call.
Wrong. Martin committed felony aggravated battery against Zimmerman when he sucker-punched him in the nose (PROTIP: the medical record confirms his nose was broken), and when he got on top of him while on the ground, pinned him there, prevented him from getting up, and pummeled him (PROTIP: multiple witness testimonies confirm that Martin was on top of Zimmerman; EMS witness testimony confirm Zimmerman’s bloodied state).
Till then I have to accept George’s word for it and I don’t think (like the police) his injuries appear life-threatening.Florida statutes do not require Zimmerman to have sustained life-threatening injuries; rather, Florida statutes require that a reasonable person would fear a threat to life or imminent bodily harm. Zimmerman easily surpasses such a threshold.
I don’t know if his nose was broken.The medical record in evidence confirms Zimmerman’s nose was broken.
I have to accept George’s word for it…Yes, you do. And legally, so does the State: because Zimmerman is afforded the presumption of innocence. And the State is already on record, in court, stating that they have no evidence to refute Zimmerman’s testimony.
I know if my head were bashed into concrete multiple times till I felt I needed to kill someone, I would want to know about internal injuries I might have that could only be diagnosed in a hospital setting.
Well, bully for you; but that’s entirely irrelevant to the case at hand.
I do know that Trayvon would never have crossed paths with George unless George saw him as a suspect.Zimmerman viewing Martin as a “suspect” is not illegal, and does not cause him to forfeit his legal right to self defense.
I have questions as to why George considered him a suspect and why he did not identify himself when allegedly Trayvon asked him if he had a problem.Why Zimmerman viewed Martin as a suspect is likewise irrelevant, and Zimmerman bore no legal responsibility to identify himself. Failure to disclose his identity, or anything else, did not cause Zimmerman to forfeit his legal right to self defense.
I hope this goes to trial and questions are answered by witnesses, evidence and forensics. If not, George will never truly clear his name.This case will never see a jury. Zimmerman will be granted immunity – an act that will inherently “clear” his name.
Now, do you have anything substantive to add to the discussion? (Don’t worry; that’s rhetorical.)