Quote:
John GaltAll illegal aliens are criminals. There are no “good ones”.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/i ... gal-aliens Rubio and his 'non-criminal' illegal aliensBy Jon Feere, contributor
January 27, 2016, 07:30 am
On the Jan. 17 edition of "Meet the Press," presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) was quizzed about his immigration proposal. He explained: "If you're a criminal alien, no, you can't stay. If you're someone that hasn't been here for a very long time, you can't stay."
Host Chuck Todd interjected, "Define 'criminal alien.'"
Rubio responded: "A felon. ... [S]omeone who's committed a crime, a non-immigration-related — and that's what I've talked about in the past. ... I don't think you're gonna round up and deport 12 million people."
This response indicates that the way Rubio approaches immigration and amnesty is not all that different from President Obama, who has made it policy to largely focus on only the worst of the worst when it comes to deportation. The president's policies have made violence a virtual prerequisite for deportation, as most immigration violations are given a pass.
[......]
In my report titled
"The Myth of the 'Otherwise Law-Abiding' Illegal Alien," I list dozens of statutes the average, nonviolent illegal alien may be violating, some of which can be felonies. Since most are "non-immigration-related" as Rubio puts it — for example, anyone can commit aggravated identity theft (18 U.S. Code § 1028A) — one must wonder whether Rubio would consider violation of this statute by an illegal alien in the course of illegal entry to be "immigration-related" and therefore not a felony for purposes of immigration law enforcement. Or, looking at "False Personation of a U.S. Citizen" (18 U.S. Code § 911) — something that can be prosecuted as a felony — would Rubio consider this to be an "immigration-related" violation (i.e., the illegal alien just really wanted to be a citizen!) and therefore not enough to lead to deportation? And what about statues like "Willful Failure or Refusal to Depart" (8 U.S. Code § 1253), violated by illegal aliens who have already been ordered to leave the country? This is one of those immigration-related statutes that Rubio wants to ignore?
When presidential candidates start to promise nonenforcement of immigration laws based on political considerations, things get complicated very quickly. And when did it become legitimate for politicians to give lawbreaking foreigners a pass for their crimes anyhow?
...more at linkhttp://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/i ... gal-aliens