Random Topics http://www.randomtopics.org/ |
|
CLINTON CRIMES http://www.randomtopics.org/viewtopic.php?f=144&t=1744 |
Page 2 of 11 |
Author: | Rumpole [ Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: POTUS Election 2016 - DISCUSSION |
The thing I heard on Fox about maybe Congress getting to see what Crooked Hillary said to FBI in her 3 hour+ "interview" was mentioned again.... The FBI WILL supply "Interview Notes" ... maybe tomorrow (Monday) There is no Recording or stenographer present!!! No Transcript. THAT fact in itself should be subject of an inquiry IMO. This is incompetence AND/OR corruption. Collusion between Crooked Hillary and FBI |
Author: | Rumpole [ Mon Aug 15, 2016 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Hillary Clinton's America | Dinesh D'Souza and Stefan Molyneux |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
I see State Department has BLOCKED the FBI notes on Crooked Hillary Interview being given to congress There is push-back... so hopefully this block wont work!! |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
I now hear the the Clinton-FBI Interview notes WILL be turned over to Congress today |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 3:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
FBI gives Congress 'secret' documents on Clinton emails By Sarah Westwood • 8/16/16 3:26 PM FBI agents provided the House Oversight Committee a "number of documents" on Tuesday related to their investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email use. The records were marked "secret," the second-highest level of classification given to government documents, a committee aide told the Washington Examiner. "Committee staff is currently reviewing the information," the aide said in a statement. "There are no further details at this time." A Justice Department letter to Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the Oversight Committee, and Rep. Elijah Cummings, the panel's ranking Democrat, described the records only as a "document production" and did not specify whether the files provided were notes from the FBI's interview of Clinton, as some reports have indicated. Clinton's three-hour interview with the FBI in early July was not transcribed nor taken under oath, FBI Director James Comey revealed to the committee last month. ...more at link http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fbi-g ... le/2599474 |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
The Oversight Committee have produced their own YT Video.... https://oversight.house.gov/ Were Hillary Clinton's Statements False? |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Trey Gowdy grills Jim Comey on Hillary Clinton Email Scandal |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Hillary Clinton LYING UNDER OATH, clear grounds for PERJURY |
Author: | Rumpole [ Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Clinton Foundation hired cyber firm after suspected hacking: sources By Mark Hosenball, Dustin Volz and John Walcott | WASHINGTON Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:17pm EDT Bill and Hillary Clinton's charitable foundation hired the security firm FireEye to examine its data systems after seeing indications they might have been hacked, according to two sources familiar with the matter. So far, no message or document hacked from the New York-based Clinton Foundation has surfaced in public, the sources said. [....] Although no documents have emerged, the attacks have left some Democrats and Clinton campaign officials worried that the hackers might have obtained emails and voice messages that could be used to reinforce Republican charges that donors to the Clinton Foundation were rewarded with access to Clinton and her aides while she was secretary of state or to her husband, former President Bill Clinton. [....] Anxiety in Washington over the possibility that a foreign power might be using hacked information to meddle in the U.S. election has prompted some Democrats and cyber security experts to urge the Obama administration to blame Russia publicly. ....more at link http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c ... SKCN10T01G |
Author: | Rumpole [ Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Notes. The "concern" is transferred to "The Russians" who did the hacking.. rather than the content. The content being EVIDENCE of Clinton crimes. |
Author: | Molly [ Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Good article. She wasn't concerned with personal or State Dept info, but boy howdy, she and Bill are going to make sure any illegal goings on from this point on are protected, with that money-making Foundation data. |
Author: | Rumpole [ Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters Full [Video created in 2008 copied in 2013] |
Author: | Rumpole [ Sat Aug 20, 2016 12:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Judicial Watch: Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Questions under Oath in Email Scandal AUGUST 19, 2016 (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s decision granting Judicial Watch permission to submit interrogatories to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to depose the former Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-IRM”) John Bentel:
The court order reads:
In his opinion Judge Sullivan writes:
On July 8 Judicial Watch submitted a request for permission to depose Clinton; the Director of Office of Correspondence and Records of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-CRM”) Clarence Finney; and Bentel. The request arises in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before Judge Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton. The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system. (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). ...more at link http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room ... il-system/ |
Author: | Rumpole [ Sat Aug 20, 2016 2:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
I have heard an opinuon that Crooked Hillary could ask for an extension to the 30 days she has to reply. Simply do the usual Clinton trick. Delay replying until after the election. I think it would be a good idea to get a copy of the questions and ANSWER THEM "on behalf of Crooked Hillary" eg JUDICIAL WATCH: Why did you set up a private server? CROOKED HILLARY: To keep all my illegal dealings secret. To avoid/control all FOIA requests. Facilitate delete/destroy evidence when it became necessary. Publicize these predicted HONEST replies from Hillary. In the absence of her actual replies they become fact in many peoples minds. At the very Least, Crooked Hillary will be forced to give her answers by way of refuting the predicted answers. |
Author: | Molly [ Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
LOL, I had to read that last part several times. Now that's funny. I think Judicial Watch has done an outstanding job, keeping the pressure on HRC criminal issues. They've been successful in their requests. I was surprised at this ruling and do think Clinton will take advantage of any delay loopholes. Hoping I don't have too much faith in the October wikileaks drop. 'Cause I'm thinking Hillary will be disqualified and Uncle Joe will step in. I got high hopes. |
Author: | Rumpole [ Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Author: | Rumpole [ Tue Aug 23, 2016 3:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
Tom Fitton discussing the bombshell release of Clinton emails by Team Judicial Watch |
Author: | Molly [ Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
I read 5 hours of emails at Wikileaks last night, mostly: 9/11/2012 - Benghazi attacks 12/15/2012 - around the time of HRC's dehydration/fainting episode - she was scheduled to testify before Congress on December 20 about the attack in Benghazi 1/23/2013 - HRC's first testimony at a Senate hearing on Benghazi As I was reading the aftermath of 9/11 emails, I was puzzled about a name Diane Reynolds, as seeming to be a very close friend who I've never heard of. I almost googled it, but figured it was just that - a close friend. _____________________ Wikileaks@wikileaks 1 hr 67 emails between Hillary & Chelsea Clinton under the latter's covert name 'Diane Reynolds' https://t.co/MYTJMWbX3J (the emails are already sorted by name) |
Author: | WKC [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Move |
Just for reference here is direct link to the wikileak document: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/25404 Now I guess we have to decide who all releases what. Maybe both should just release medical and tax information but frankly no law forces them to do so. I do believe Hillary has some hidden personal issues that are about to make a big change in this whole process as the public slowly becomes aware and begins asking more questions. |
Author: | Rumpole [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 5:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: CLINTON CRIMES |
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-rele ... estigate-c |
Page 2 of 11 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |